CVE-2023-42497
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedReflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability on the Export for Translation page in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.4 through 7.4.3.85, and Liferay DXP 7.4 before update 86 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the `_com_liferay_translation_web_internal_portlet_TranslationPortlet_redirect` parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.4 through 7.4.3.85 and Liferay DXP 7.4 before update 86 on the Export for Translation page. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the _com_lifera_translation_web_internal_portlet_TranslationPortlet_redirect parameter.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.4>= 7.4.3.4, < 7.4.3.86CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Liffel Portal or DXP versionCheck the installed Liffel Portal or DXP version. This is typically visible in the Control Panel under Configuration > Server Information, or by examining the bundle properties file (e.g., portal-impl.properties or the WAR manifest).Affected if The installed version is 7.4.3.4 through 7.4.3.85, or DXP 7.4 before update 86.
-
Verify the Translation module is deployedConfirm that the Translation module (com_lifera_translation_web) is deployed and running. This can be checked in the Liffel Control Panel under Apps > App Manager, or via the OSGi console (g! ps | grep translation).Affected if The Translation portlet module is present in the deployment.
-
Confirm Export for Translation page accessDetermine if users can access the Export for Translation functionality. Navigate to the Translation portlet (typically under Site Administration > Publishing > Translation) or check the portlet configuration for the presence of the export feature.Affected if The Export for Translation page is accessible to users, either anonymously or with authenticated access.
-
Inspect for the vulnerable parameter in requestsReview HTTP requests and logs for usage of the _com_lifera_translation_web_internal_portlet_TranslationPortlet_redirect parameter. This can be done by examining browser developer tools, proxy logs, or server access logs when the Translation portlet is used.Affected if The vulnerable redirect parameter is being used in requests to the Translation portlet.
The environment is affected if it runs Liffel Portal 7.4.3.4-7.4.3.85 or Liffel DXP 7.4 before update 86, has the Translation portlet deployed, and exposes the Export for Translation functionality to users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.86
Upgrade to Liferay Portal 7.4.3.86, Liferay DXP 7.4 update 86, or later versions which contain the fix for this vulnerability.
Lifer Portal 7.4.3.86 or Lifer DXP 7.4 update 86
- 1. Back up your current Lifer Portal or DXP installation and database
- 2. Download Lifer Portal 7.4.3.86 or later from the official Lifer downloads page
- 3. Stop the Lifer application server
- 4. Upgrade the Lifer Portal/DXP installation to version 7.4.3.86 (or DXP 7.4 update 86) following the official upgrade documentation
- 5. Start the application server and verify the Translation Portlet functionality works correctly
- 6. Test that the XSS vulnerability is remediated by verifying the redirect parameter is properly sanitized
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-42497 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-42497 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data