InspecApplication · Chef

CVE-2023-42658

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-10-31
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.56.58 / 5.22.29 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Archive command in Chef InSpec prior to 4.56.58 and 5.22.29 allow local command execution via maliciously crafted profile.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The archive command in Chef InSpec versions prior to 4.56.58 and 5.22.29 fails to properly sanitize input when processing a maliciously crafted profile, allowing local command execution. This command injection vulnerability is triggered when InSpec processes a specially crafted profile archive.

MitigationUpgrade Chef InSpec to version 4.56.58 or 5.22.29 or later. Additionally, only process profile archives from trusted sources and avoid running the archive command on untrusted profiles.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
InspecApplication
Affected:< 4.56.58>= 5.0.0, < 5.22.29

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed Chef InSpec version
    Run `inspec --version` or check the InSpec gem version with `gem list inspec`
    Affected if The version output is less than 4.56.58, or is 5.0.0 to less than 5.22.29
  2. Identify if the archive command has been executed
    Review shell history, logs, or automation scripts for use of `inspec archive` or the InSpec archive API functionality
    Affected if The archive command has been run to process profile archives
  3. Locate processed profile archives
    Search for .tar.gz or .zip profile archive files in working directories, CI/CD artifacts, or downloaded locations
    Affected if There are profile archives that were or could be processed by InSpec, especially from untrusted sources
  4. Check for unexpected shell behavior after archive operations
    Review for any anomalous process spawns, unexpected file creations, or shell executions that occurred during or after InSpec archive command usage
    Affected if Unusual command execution or system behavior occurred in conjunction with InSpec archive processing

You are affected if your Chef InSpec version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND you have used the archive command to process profile archives, particularly from untrusted sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.56.58 / 5.22.29 or later
Fixed in 4.56.585.22.29
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Chef InSpec to version 4.56.58 or 5.22.29 or later. Additionally, only process profile archives from trusted sources and avoid running the archive command on untrusted profiles.

Recommended fix High confidence

Upgrade to InSpec 4.56.58 (4.x branch) or InSpec 5.22.29 (5.x branch)

  1. Check current InSpec version using: inspec --version
  2. For InSpec 4.x users: Upgrade to version 4.56.58 or later using: gem install inspec --version '~> 4.56.58'
  3. For InSpec 5.x users: Upgrade to version 5.22.29 or later using: gem install inspec --version '~> 5.22.29'
  4. Alternatively, update via package manager: brew upgrade inspec (macOS) or use appropriate system package manager
  5. Verify the upgrade was successful by running: inspec --version
  6. Confirm the installed version is >= 4.56.58 or >= 5.22.29 depending on your major version branch

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Inspec Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-42658 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-42658 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data