Incorrect Default PermissionsWeakness · CWE-276

CVE-2023-42668

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Incorrect default permissions in some onboard video driver software before version 1.14 for Intel(R) Server Boards based on Intel(R) 62X Chipset may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Incorrect default permissions in the onboard video driver for Intel Server Boards based on Intel 62X Chipset allows an authenticated local user to potentially escalate privileges. The vulnerability exists in driver versions prior to 1.14.

MitigationUpgrade the Intel onboard video driver software to version 1.14 or later to remediate the incorrect default permissions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the server board model
    Check the system information to confirm the server board is an Intel Server Board based on the Intel 62X Chipset. This can typically be done via system BIOS information, dmidecode output, or vendor documentation.
    Affected if The system is not an Intel Server Board with 62X Chipset, then this specific CVE does not apply.
  2. Locate the onboard video driver
    Identify the installed video driver on the system. On Windows, check Device Manager under Display Adapters. On Linux, check via lspci or lsmod for video/graphics drivers.
    Affected if No Intel onboard video driver is present, the vulnerability does not apply.
  3. Determine the driver version
    Retrieve the version of the Intel onboard video driver. In Windows, right-click the driver in Device Manager and select Properties > Driver tab. On Linux, use modinfo or check /var/log for driver loading messages.
    Affected if The driver version cannot be determined or is not the Intel onboard video driver for this chipset.
  4. Compare to the affected version range
    Compare the installed driver version to 1.14. Versions prior to 1.14 (such as 1.13.x, 1.12.x, etc.) are affected. Version 1.14 and later are not affected.
    Affected if The installed driver version is less than 1.14 (for example, 1.13.0 or earlier).

The system is affected if it is an Intel Server Board based on the 62X Chipset with an onboard video driver version installed that is earlier than 1.14.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade the Intel onboard video driver software to version 1.14 or later to remediate the incorrect default permissions.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Intel onboard video driver version 1.14 for Intel Server Boards with Intel 62X Chipset

  1. Locate the Intel security advisory for CVE-2023-42668 on www.intel.com
  2. Identify the specific Intel Server Board model(s) based on the 62X Chipset in your environment
  3. Download the onboard video driver software version 1.14 or later from Intel's support site
  4. Apply the driver update according to Intel's installation instructions for the specific server board model

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-42668 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-42668 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data