CVE-2023-42917
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA memory corruption vulnerability was addressed with improved locking. This issue is fixed in iOS 17.1.2 and iPadOS 17.1.2, macOS Sonoma 14.1.2, Safari 17.1.2. Processing web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been exploited against versions of iOS before iOS 16.7.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory corruption vulnerability in WebKit (Apple's browser engine) that could be triggered by processing malicious web content, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. The fix involved improved locking, indicating a race condition in memory management. This was actively exploited in the wild against iOS versions prior to iOS 16.7.1.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 17.1.2= 11.0= 12.0= 38= 39< 15.8.1>= 16.0, < 16.7.3>= 17.0, < 17.1.2< 15.8.1>= 16.0, < 16.7.3>= 17.0, < 17.1.2>= 14.0, < 14.1.2< 2.42.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Safari version on macOSOpen Safari, go to Safari > About Safari to view the version numberAffected if Version is earlier than 17.1.2 on macOS 14 (Sonoma) or earlier
-
Check iOS version on iPhoneGo to Settings > General > About to view the iOS versionAffected if Version is earlier than 15.8.1, OR between 16.0 and 16.7.3, OR between 17.0 and 17.1.2
-
Check iPadOS version on iPadGo to Settings > General > About to view the iPadOS versionAffected if Version is earlier than 15.8.1, OR between 16.0 and 16.7.3, OR between 17.0 and 17.1.2
-
Check WebKitGTK version on Debian or Fedora LinuxRun dpkg -l | grep webkit2gtk (Debian) or rpm -qa | grep webkit2gtk (Fedora) to list installed WebKit packagesAffected if Version is earlier than 2.42.3 (such as 2.42.0, 2.40.x, or earlier)
-
Verify WebView usage on affected platformsConfirm whether Safari, any app using UIWebView/WKWebView, or webkit2gtk-based browsers (like Epiphany) are actively used on the deviceAffected if The vulnerable WebKit component is actively used to render untrusted web content
You are affected if your Safari/iOS/iPadOS/macOS or WebKitGTK version falls within the affected ranges and you use WebKit to browse web content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.42.314.1.215.8.1
Update all affected devices to the patched versions: iOS 17.1.2/iPadOS 17.1.2 or later, macOS Sonoma 14.1.2 or later, or Safari 17.1.2 or later. For devices unable to upgrade to iOS 17, apply iOS 16.7.1 which also contains the fix.
iOS 17.1.2 / iPadOS 17.1.2 / macOS Sonoma 14.1.2 / Safari 17.1.2
- Check current Safari version: Open Safari > Safari menu > About Safari
- Check current iOS/iPadOS version: Settings > General > About > Version
- Check current macOS version: Apple menu > About This Mac > Version
- For iOS/iPadOS: Go to Settings > General > Software Update and update to iOS/iPadOS 17.1.2 or later
- For macOS: Go to System Settings > General > Software Update and update to macOS Sonoma 14.1.2 or later
- For Safari (if standalone): Open App Store > Updates and update to Safari 17.1.2 or later
- After update, verify the fix by checking About Safari shows version 17.1.2 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-42917 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- www.openwall.com
- security.gentoo.org
- www.debian.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-42917 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data