CVE-2023-42920
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedClaris International has fixed a dylib hijacking vulnerability in the FileMaker Pro.app and Claris Pro.app versions on macOS.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a dylib hijacking vulnerability in FileMaker Pro.app and Claris Pro.app on macOS. Dylib hijacking occurs when an application loads a dynamic library from an insecure path, allowing an attacker to place a malicious library in a location where the application will load it instead of the legitimate one. This can lead to arbitrary code execution within the application's context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions< 20.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify FileMaker Pro or Claris Pro installationCheck /Applications folder for 'FileMaker Pro.app' or 'Claris Pro.app' bundle existence. Use command: ls -la /Applications/ | grep -i 'FileMaker\|Claris'Affected if Either FileMaker Pro.app or Claris Pro.app is present on the system
-
Identify installed version of FileMaker ProRight-click the app in /Applications, select 'Get Info', or run: defaults read /Applications/FileMaker\ Pro.app/Contents/Info.plist CFBundleShortVersionStringAffected if Version is less than 20.2 (for FileMaker Pro)
-
Identify installed version of Claris ProRight-click the app in /Applications, select 'Get Info', or run: defaults read /Applications/Claris\ Pro.app/Contents/Info.plist CFBundleShortVersionStringAffected if Any version is installed (Claris Pro has no fixed version threshold, all versions affected)
-
Confirm dylib loading configuration existsExamine the application's Info.plist for LSRequireClassic or investigate the app bundle's MacOS/Frameworks directory for library loading directives. Use: ls -la /Applications/FileMaker\ Pro.app/Contents/Affected if The application bundle contains configuration that allows loading dylibs from insecure paths
User is affected if FileMaker Pro with version < 20.2 or any version of Claris Pro is installed and the application uses vulnerable dylib loading behavior.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data20.2
Apply the vendor-provided security update to FileMaker Pro.app and Claris Pro.app to address the dylib hijacking vulnerability.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-42920 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-42920 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data