CVE-2023-43037
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Maximo Application Suite 8.11 and 9.0 could allow an authenticated user to perform unauthorized actions due to improper input validation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Maximo Application Suite versions 8.11 and 9.0 contain an improper input validation flaw that allows authenticated users to perform unauthorized actions. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of user inputs, potentially enabling authenticated attackers to bypass intended access controls and execute actions outside their authorized permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.11, < 8.11.13= 9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm IBM Maximo Application Suite installationIdentify if the IBM Maximo Application Suite product is deployed in your environment by checking for Maximo-related services, processes, or installation directories commonly associated with this product.Affected if IBM Maximo Application Suite is not present in your environment, you are not affected.
-
Determine installed versionLocate and retrieve the version information of your IBM Maximo Application Suite installation. Consult product documentation for version retrieval methods, typically accessible through admin interfaces, configuration files, or built-in version commands.Affected if You cannot determine the version - treat as potentially affected if the product is installed.
-
Compare version against affected rangesCheck if your installed version falls within: version 8.11.0 through 8.11.12 (all versions >= 8.11 but < 8.11.13), OR exactly version 9.0. If your version is 8.11.13 or higher, you are not in the affected range.Affected if Your version is 8.11.0-8.11.12 OR exactly 9.0 - you are potentially affected.
-
Verify authentication is enabledConfirm that user authentication is enabled and user accounts can log into the Maximo Application Suite. This vulnerability requires an authenticated user session to exploit.Affected if Authentication is disabled or no user accounts exist - the exploitation vector is not available, though the vulnerability may still exist in the software.
You are affected if IBM Maximo Application Suite is installed and your version is 8.11.0 through 8.11.12 or exactly version 9.0, and user authentication is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.11.13
Apply IBM's security patch for this vulnerability or upgrade to a fixed version. Additionally, implement rigorous input validation and enforce proper authorization checks on all user actions within the application.
IBM Maximo Application Suite 8.11.13 or later
- Review IBM Maximo Application Suite upgrade documentation before proceeding
- Ensure you have a complete backup of your current MAS configuration and data
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- Upgrade IBM Maximo Application Suite from your current version (8.11.x or 9.0) to version 8.11.13 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by logging in and checking the version information
- Test that the improper input validation issue is resolved by verifying authenticated users cannot perform previously unauthorized actions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-43037 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-43037 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data