CVE-2023-43567
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA buffer overflow was reported in the LemSecureBootForceKey module in some Lenovo Desktop products that may allow a local attacker with elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the LemSecureBootForceKey module of certain Lenovo Desktop products. An attacker with already-elevated local privileges can exploit this buffer overflow to execute arbitrary code with those elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< o4hkt3ca< o4fkt39a< m2vkt21a< m42kt46a< m4ukt36aall versionsall versions< m40kt45aCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your Lenovo desktop modelRun 'systeminfo' or check the physical machine label to confirm the exact model (e.g., Ideacentre C5 14imb05, Thinkcentre Neo 70t Gen 3)Affected if The model matches any of the affected product names listed in the CVE
-
Retrieve your current firmware versionAccess the UEFI/BIOS setup during boot (press F1 or Delete) and check the BIOS version, or use commands like 'wmic bios get smbiosbiosversion' on Windows or 'dmidecode -s bios-version' on LinuxAffected if The firmware version is returned and can be compared against the affected ranges
-
Compare your firmware version to the affected rangesFor each affected model, compare your installed version string to the threshold: C5 14imb05 requires < o4hkt3ca, 3 07ada05 requires < o4fkt39a, 3 07imb05 requires < m2vkt21a, 5 14iab7 requires < m42kt46a, 5 14irb8 requires < m4ukt36a, Thinkcentre Neo 70t Gen 3 requires < m40kt45a. Ideacentre 5 14acn6 and T540 15ama G are affected at all versionsAffected if Your firmware version is lower than the threshold version, or your model is one of the 'all versions' variants
-
Verify the LemSecureBootForceKey module is presentThis module is a UEFI firmware component and is not directly visible from the operating system. Check if your firmware/BIOS supports the 'SecureBoot Force Key' feature in the UEFI settings, typically under Security or Boot optionsAffected if The system has UEFI firmware with SecureBoot configuration capabilities (the vulnerable module exists in the firmware)
You are affected if your Lenovo desktop model matches one of the eight affected products and your current firmware version falls below the specified threshold version (or is any version for the two 'all versions' models).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Lenovo firmware/security updates for affected desktop products once released. Since this requires local elevated access, ensure systems are not exposed to untrusted local users and restrict physical access to endpoints.
Upgrade to firmware version o4hkt3ca (C5 14imb05), o4fkt39a (3 07ada05), m2vkt21a (3 07imb05), m42kt46a (5 14iab7), m4ukt36a (5 14irb8), or m40kt45a (Thinkcentre Neo 70t Gen 3) depending on model; Ideacentre 5 14acn6 and Ideacentre T540 15ama G have no fixed firmware available
- 1. Identify the exact model number of the affected Lenovo desktop system
- 2. Navigate to support.lenovo.com and enter the product model number to access the drivers and firmware download page
- 3. Locate the BIOS/UEFI firmware update for the specific model
- 4. Download the firmware update version that matches or exceeds the fixed version for your model: o4hkt3ca for C5 14imb05, o4fkt39a for 3 07ada05, m2vkt21a for 3 07imb05, m42kt46a for 5 14iab7, m4ukt36a for 5 14irb8, m40kt45a for Thinkcentre Neo 70t Gen 3
- 5. Review the firmware update release notes for any prerequisites or warnings
- 6. Run the firmware update utility as an administrator, ensuring the system is connected to power and not interrupted
- 7. After the update completes, verify the firmware version has been applied successfully
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-43567 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-43567 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data