CVE-2023-43577
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA buffer overflow was reported in the ReFlash module in some Lenovo Desktop products that may allow a local attacker with elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the ReFlash module of certain Lenovo Desktop products. This module, typically used for firmware flashing operations, fails to properly validate buffer boundaries when processing input, allowing an attacker with elevated local privileges to overwrite memory and execute arbitrary code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< o4hkt3ca< o4fkt39a< m2vkt21a< m42kt46a< m4ukt36aall versionsall versions< m40kt45aCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Lenovo desktop modelRun 'systeminfo' (Windows) or check /sys/class/dmi/id/product_name (Linux) to confirm the system is an Ideacentre C5 14imb05, Ideacentre 3 07ada05, Ideacentre 3 07imb05, Ideacentre 5 14iab7, Ideacentre 5 14irb8, Ideacentre 5 14acn6, Ideacentre T540 15ama G, or Thinkcentre Neo 70t Gen 3Affected if The model matches any of the affected products listed in the CVE
-
Check the current firmware versionAccess the UEFI/BIOS setup during boot or use a tool like 'wmic bios get smbiosbiosversion' (Windows) or 'dmidecode -s bios-version' (Linux) to retrieve the installed firmware versionAffected if The installed version is below the threshold specified for that model (e.g., < o4hkt3ca for C5 14imb05, < o4fkt39a for 3 07ada05, < m2vkt21a for 3 07imb05, < m42kt46a for 5 14iab7, < m4ukt36a for 5 14irb8, or any version for 5 14acn6 and T540 15ama G, or < m40kt45a for Neo 70t Gen 3)
-
Verify ReFlash module availabilityCheck if the firmware flashing utility or ReFlash functionality is present on the system, typically found in the UEFI/BIOS interface or via vendor tools like Lenovo Vantage or BIOS update utilitiesAffected if The ReFlash module is accessible and can be invoked by a local privileged user
Your system is affected if it is one of the listed Lenovo desktop models AND the installed firmware version falls below the specified threshold (or is any version for the models marked 'all versions'), allowing a local attacker with elevated privileges to trigger the buffer overflow in the ReFlash module.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Lenovo security firmware update for affected Desktop products. Restrict local privileged access and monitor for suspicious use of flashing utilities.
Firmware version o4hkt3ca (or newer) for Ideacentre C5 14imb05; o4fkt39a (or newer) for Ideacentre 3 07ada05; m2vkt21a (or newer) for Ideacentre 3 07imb05; m42kt46a (or newer) for Ideacentre 5 14iab7; m4ukt36a (or newer) for Ideacentre 5 14irb8; m40kt45a (or newer) for Thinkcentre Neo 70t Gen 3
- 1. Identify the exact model number of the Lenovo desktop from the affected product list.
- 2. Navigate to support.lenovo.com and enter the product model number to access the drivers and firmware download page.
- 3. Locate the BIOS/Firmware update for the specific machine.
- 4. Download the firmware update package that is version o4hkt3ca or higher for Ideacentre C5 14imb05, o4fkt39a or higher for Ideacentre 3 07ada05, m2vkt21a or higher for Ideacentre 3 07imb05, m42kt46a or higher for Ideacentre 5 14iab7, m4ukt36a or higher for Ideacentre 5 14irb8, or m40kt45a or higher for Thinkcentre Neo 70t Gen 3.
- 5. For Ideacentre 5 14acn6 and Ideacentre T540 15ama G (all versions affected), check Lenovo support for any available firmware update or contact Lenovo support directly.
- 6. Follow Lenovo's firmware update instructions carefully, typically involving running the update utility from Windows or creating a bootable USB update media.
- 7. Ensure the system is connected to power and not interrupted during the firmware flash process.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-43577 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-43577 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data