Forgot PasswordApplication · Mendix

CVE-2023-43623

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-10-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.7.3 / 4.1.3 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been identified in Mendix Forgot Password (Mendix 10 compatible) (All versions < V5.4.0), Mendix Forgot Password (Mendix 7 compatible) (All versions < V3.7.3), Mendix Forgot Password (Mendix 8 compatible) (All versions < V4.1.3), Mendix Forgot Password (Mendix 9 compatible) (All versions < V5.4.0). Applications using the affected module are vulnerable to user enumeration due to distinguishable responses. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to determine if a user is valid or not, enabling a brute force attack with valid users.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Mendix Forgot Password module returns distinguishable responses for valid versus invalid usernames, allowing unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid user accounts. This information can then be used to target specific accounts in brute-force attacks.

MitigationUpgrade the Mendix Forgot Password module to version V5.4.0 (Mendix 9/10), V4.1.3 (Mendix 8), or V3.7.3 (Mendix 7) to ensure uniform response messages for both valid and invalid usernames.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Forgot PasswordApplication
Affected:< 3.7.3>= 4.0.0, < 4.1.3>= 5.0.0, < 5.4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Forgot Password module is deployed
    Review your Mendix application project structure or deployment artifacts for the presence of the 'ForgotPassword' or 'Forgot_ password' module directory
    Affected if The Forgot Password module is present in your deployment
  2. Determine Forgot Password module version
    Locate the module's metadata file (typically in the project folder or deployment package) and read the module version from the module version file or manifest
    Affected if The installed version is less than 3.7.3, OR between 4.0.0 and 4.1.3 (exclusive), OR between 5.0.0 and 5.4.0 (exclusive)
  3. Test password reset response differentiation
    Submit a forgot password request using a known-valid username/email and observe the response, then submit a request using a random/invalid username/email and compare the response messages, error codes, or timing
    Affected if The responses differ meaningfully between valid and invalid usernames (for example, distinct error messages like 'user not found' versus 'password reset email sent' or different HTTP status codes)

You are affected if the Forgot Password module is deployed with a version in the affected ranges AND it returns distinguishable responses for valid versus invalid usernames during password reset requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.7.3 / 4.1.3 / 5.4.0 or later
Fixed in 3.7.34.1.35.4.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the Mendix Forgot Password module to version V5.4.0 (Mendix 9/10), V4.1.3 (Mendix 8), or V3.7.3 (Mendix 7) to ensure uniform response messages for both valid and invalid usernames.

Recommended fix High confidence

Mendix Forgot Password: 3.7.3 (Mendix 7), 4.1.3 (Mendix 8), or 5.4.0 (Mendix 9/10)

  1. 1. Identify the Mendix version used by your application (7, 8, 9, or 10)
  2. 2. Locate the Mendix Forgot Password module in your project
  3. 3. Download the fixed version from the Mendix App Store or your organization's software repository: For Mendix 7 use version 3.7.3; For Mendix 8 use version 4.1.3; For Mendix 9 or 10 use version 5.4.0
  4. 4. In Mendix Studio Pro, go to the 'App' menu and select 'Update module' or manually replace the module files
  5. 5. Run the application locally and verify the forgot password functionality works correctly
  6. 6. Test that the application now returns uniform responses regardless of whether a user account exists
  7. 7. Deploy the updated application to production environments
Caveat Review release notes for any breaking changes between your current version and the fixed version before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Forgot Password Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,590
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-43623 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-43623 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data