CVE-2023-43758
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper input validation in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper input validation in UEFI firmware for certain Intel processors allows a privileged local user to escalate their privileges. This is a firmware-level vulnerability requiring local access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Intel processor modelRun 'dmidecode -s processor-version' on Linux, 'wmic cpu get name' on Windows, or check system information to obtain the exact CPU model numberAffected if The CPU model matches an Intel processor generation listed in Intel's security advisory for this CVE (check Intel.com for affected CPU listings)
-
Check the current UEFI/BIOS versionRun 'dmidecode -s bios-version' on Linux, 'wmic bios get smbiosbiosversion' on Windows, or access the UEFI/BIOS setup screen to view the firmware versionAffected if The installed BIOS/UEFI version is older than the version Intel has listed as fixed for your specific processor model
-
Verify UEFI firmware is presentConfirm the system uses UEFI boot rather than legacy BIOS by checking for /sys/firmware/efi on Linux or via 'msinfo32' on WindowsAffected if UEFI mode is enabled; this vulnerability affects UEFI firmware specifically
-
Confirm local privileged accessVerify the user account in question has elevated privileges (administrator/root or equivalent) on the local systemAffected if The attacker already has privileged local access, which is required to exploit this vulnerability
You are affected if your system uses an affected Intel processor model with a UEFI BIOS version older than Intel's fixed version for that CPU, and an unpatched UEFI firmware is installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Intel-provided UEFI firmware updates to affected processors; verify successful installation and ensure firmware integrity mechanisms are enabled.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,640.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-43758 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-43758 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data