CVE-2023-44175
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Reachable Assertion vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows to send specific genuine PIM packets to the device resulting in rpd to crash causing a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. Note: This issue is not noticed when all the devices in the network are Juniper devices. This issue affects Juniper Networks: Junos OS: * All versions prior to 20.4R3-S7; * 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S5; * 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S4; * 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S4; * 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-S4; * 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R3; * 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R3; * 22.4 versions prior to 22.4R3. Junos OS Evolved: * All versions prior to 22.3R3-EVO; * 22.4-EVO versions prior to 22.4R3-EVO; * 23.2-EVO versions prior to 23.2R1-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reachable assertion vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending specific genuine PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast) packets that trigger an assertion failure in rpd, causing the daemon to crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.4= 20.4= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify PIM protocol is enabled on the deviceRun 'show protocols pim' or check the configuration under 'protocols pim' hierarchy using 'show configuration protocols pim'Affected if PIM is enabled and configured - the vulnerability is only triggerable when PIM is active
-
Confirm the Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' to obtain the exact software versionAffected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions: Junos < 20.4, = 20.4, = 21.2, = 21.3, = 21.4, = 22.1, = 22.2, = 22.3, = 22.4; or Junos OS Evolved = 22.3, = 22.4, = 23.2
-
Check rpd daemon statusRun 'show system processes routing' or 'systemctl status rpd' on Evolved variants to verify the routing daemon is runningAffected if rpd is running - this is the daemon that will crash when the vulnerability is triggered
-
Inspect logs for rpd crashes or assertion failuresRun 'show log messages' and search for 'rpd' crash, assertion, or PIM-related errors using 'show log messages | match rpd'Affected if Recent rpd crashes or assertion failures related to PIM are logged, indicating possible exploitation attempts
You are affected if PIM protocol is enabled on a Junos device running any of the specified affected versions, and the device is exposed to PIM traffic that could trigger the rpd assertion failure.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.4
Apply the vendor-supplied software updates for Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved to the fixed versions specified in the advisory. Until patching is possible, consider filtering or rate-limiting untrusted PIM traffic at network boundaries.
Junos OS: 20.4R3-S7, 21.2R3-S5, 21.3R3-S4, 21.4R3-S4, 22.1R3-S4, 22.2R3, 22.3R3, or 22.4R3 (or later); Junos OS Evolved: 22.3R3-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, or 23.2R1-EVO (or later)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved version running on the device using 'show version'
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on current version: for Junos OS upgrade to 20.4R3-S7 or later, 21.2R3-S5 or later, 21.3R3-S4 or later, 21.4R3-S4 or later, 22.1R3-S4 or later, 22.2R3 or later, 22.3R3 or later, or 22.4R3 or later; for Junos OS Evolved upgrade to 22.3R3-EVO or later, 22.4R3-EVO or later, or 23.2R1-EVO or later
- 3. Backup the current configuration using 'request system backup' or 'file copy' to a secure location
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as the upgrade will require a reboot
- 5. Download the appropriate Junos software upgrade package from the Juniper support portal
- 6. Upload the upgrade package to the device using 'request system software add <package>'
- 7. Reboot the device to apply the upgrade using 'request system reboot'
- 8. After reboot, verify the new version is running with 'show version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-44175 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-44175 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data