CVE-2023-44196
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions in the Packet Forwarding Engine (pfe) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on PTX10003 Series allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to cause an impact to the integrity of the system. When specific transit MPLS packets are received by the PFE, these packets are internally forwarded to the RE. This issue is a prerequisite for CVE-2023-44195. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved: * All versions prior to 20.4R3-S8-EVO; * 21.1-EVO version 21.1R1-EVO and later; * 21.2-EVO versions prior to 21.2R3-S6-EVO; * 21.3-EVO version 21.3R1-EVO and later; * 21.4-EVO versions prior to 21.4R3-S3-EVO; * 22.1-EVO versions prior to 22.1R3-S4-EVO; * 22.2-EVO versions prior to 22.2R3-S3-EVO; * 22.3-EVO versions prior to 22.3R2-S2-EVO, 22.3R3-EVO; * 22.4-EVO versions prior to 22.4R2-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper check for unusual or exceptional conditions in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on PTX10003 Series allows unauthenticated adjacent attacker to cause integrity impact by sending specific transit MPLS packets that are improperly forwarded internally to the Routing Engine (RE). This vulnerability serves as a prerequisite for CVE-2023-44195.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.4= 20.4= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or check the device model to confirm it is a PTX10003 Series routerAffected if Device is a PTX10003 (PTX10003-80C, PTX10003-160C, etc.)
-
Check Junos OS Evolved versionRun 'show version invoke-on all-routing-engine' or 'show version' to identify the installed Junos OS Evolved versionAffected if Version matches: < 20.4, = 20.4, = 21.1, = 21.2, = 21.3, = 21.4, = 22.1, = 22.2, = 22.3, or = 22.4
-
Verify MPLS configurationRun 'show configuration protocols mpls' to check if MPLS is configured on the deviceAffected if MPLS protocol is enabled and configured on any interface
-
Check for transit MPLS trafficRun 'show mpls interface' to see which interfaces have MPLS enabled and are potentially processing transit trafficAffected if Device has MPLS-enabled interfaces actively processing transit MPLS packets
Device is affected if it is a PTX10003 Series running a vulnerable Junos OS Evolved version (20.4 through 22.4) with MPLS enabled and processing transit traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.4
Upgrade Junos OS Evolved to the fixed versions specified in the advisory (20.4R3-S8-EVO, 21.2R3-S6-EVO, 21.4R3-S3-EVO, 22.1R3-S4-EVO, 22.2R3-S3-EVO, 22.3R2-S2-EVO/22.3R3-EVO, or 22.4R2-EVO).
20.4R3-S8-EVO, 21.2R3-S6-EVO, 21.4R3-S3-EVO, 22.1R3-S4-EVO, 22.2R3-S3-EVO, 22.3R3-EVO, or 22.4R2-EVO (depending on which release train is appropriate for your deployment)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS Evolved version running on the affected PTX10003 device using 'show version' command
- 2. Based on the current version, determine the minimum fixed release needed according to the remediation guidance
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS Evolved image from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades require system downtime
- 5. Backup the current configuration using 'request system configuration rescue save'
- 6. Upgrade the device using 'request system software add <package-name>' followed by 'request system reboot'
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version with 'show version' and confirm system stability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-44196 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-44196 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data