CVE-2023-44204
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). When a malformed BGP UPDATE packet is received over an established BGP session, the rpd crashes and restarts. This issue affects both eBGP and iBGP implementations. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS * 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S4; * 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-S3; * 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R3-S2; * 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3; * 22.4 versions prior to 22.4R2-S1, 22.4R3; * 23.2 versions prior to 23.2R1, 23.2R2; Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved * 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S5-EVO; * 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-S3-EVO; * 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R3-S3-EVO; * 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2-S2-EVO; * 22.4 versions prior to 22.4R3-EVO; * 23.2 versions prior to 23.2R2-EVO;
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA malformed BGP UPDATE packet received on an established BGP session causes the rpd (routing protocol daemon) to crash and restart due to improper validation of syntactic correctness of input in the BGP packet parser, resulting in denial of service for both eBGP and iBGP implementations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Junos versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' on the device CLI to obtain the installed Junos versionAffected if The version matches 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4 (Junos) or 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2 (Junos OS Evolved)
-
Confirm BGP is configuredRun 'show bgp summary' or 'show configuration protocols bgp' to determine if BGP is actively configured on the deviceAffected if BGP is enabled and peers are configured (either eBGP or iBGP)
-
Check rpd crash historyRun 'show system core-dumps' and review system logs for rpd crash events using 'show log messages | match rpd' or 'show log messages | match crash'Affected if Recent rpd crashes are present in logs or core dumps exist for the rpd process
-
Inspect BGP peer statusRun 'show bgp neighbor' to examine the state of BGP peers and look for frequent session resets or unexpected down eventsAffected if BGP sessions are dropping or restarting unexpectedly without explicit administrative action
-
Review BGP UPDATE message parsingIf possible, capture BGP traffic with 'monitor traffic interface' or use external packet capture to verify if malformed UPDATE messages are being receivedAffected if Malformed BGP UPDATE packets are being received on any BGP session
A device is affected if it runs a matched Junos version, has BGP enabled, and is receiving malformed BGP UPDATE packets that could trigger rpd crashes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patches for Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved corresponding to the affected version; as a temporary mitigation, implement BGP packet filtering at network boundaries to reject malformed UPDATE messages.
Upgrade to the appropriate fixed release: Junos OS 21.4R3-S4/22.1R3-S3/22.2R3-S2/22.3R2-S2/22.3R3/22.4R2-S1/22.4R3/23.2R1/23.2R2, or Junos OS Evolved 21.4R3-S5-EVO/22.1R3-S3-EVO/22.2R3-S3-EVO/22.3R2-S2-EVO/22.4R3-EVO/23.2R2-EVO
- 1. Identify the exact Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved version currently running using 'show version' command
- 2. Determine the appropriate fixed release based on your current branch (21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, or 23.2)
- 3. For Junos OS: upgrade to 21.4R3-S4, 22.1R3-S3, 22.2R3-S2, 22.3R2-S2/22.3R3, 22.4R2-S1/22.4R3, or 23.2R1/23.2R2 as appropriate
- 4. For Junos OS Evolved: upgrade to 21.4R3-S5-EVO, 22.1R3-S3-EVO, 22.2R3-S3-EVO, 22.3R2-S2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, or 23.2R2-EVO as appropriate
- 5. Download the Junos upgrade package from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 6. Follow standard Junos upgrade procedures: copy the package to the device, run 'request system software add <package>', and reboot
- 7. After upgrade, verify the rpd process is running with 'show chassis routing-engine' and confirm BGP peers are established
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-44204 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-44204 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data