CVE-2023-44420
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link DIR-X3260 prog.cgi Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of D-Link DIR-X3260 routers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the prog.cgi executable. The issue results from an incorrect implementation of the authentication algorithm. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the device. Was ZDI-CAN-21100.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe D-Link DIR-X3260 router contains a vulnerability in the prog.cgi executable where the authentication algorithm is incorrectly implemented, allowing network-adjacent attackers to bypass authentication entirely without needing valid credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.04b01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the router's web interface or check the device label to confirm the model is D-Link DIR-X3260Affected if The device is not a D-Link DIR-X3260 router (different models are not affected by this specific CVE)
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the router web interface and navigate to Status or Management section to view the firmware version, or use the command 'grep VERSION /etc/os-release' or similar via SSH/Telnet if availableAffected if The firmware version is lower than 1.04b01 (versions from 1.00 through 1.04b00 are affected)
-
Verify prog.cgi endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access the prog.cgi endpoint on the router (typically at http://<router-ip>/prog.cgi) from a network-adjacent positionAffected if The prog.cgi endpoint is reachable from the network and responds to requests without requiring authentication
-
Check if remote management is enabledIn the router web interface, go to Management > Remote Management or similar section to see if remote access over WAN is enabledAffected if Remote management is enabled and the router is directly exposed to the internet or an attacker has network adjacency to the management interface
A user is affected if they own a D-Link DIR-X3260 router running firmware version below 1.04b01 and the prog.cgi authentication bypass can be exploited by a network-adjacent attacker.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.04b01
Apply the vendor firmware patch when available. Until then, restrict network access to the router's management interface by placing it behind a firewall or VPN, and disable remote management if enabled.
Firmware version 1.04b01 or later
- 1. Access the D-Link DIR-X3260 router web interface via its IP address
- 2. Navigate to the Administration or System settings section
- 3. Locate the Firmware Upgrade or Router Update option
- 4. Check the current firmware version to confirm it is below 1.04b01
- 5. Download the latest firmware version 1.04b01 or later from the official D-Link support website
- 6. Upload and apply the firmware update through the router's web interface
- 7. Wait for the router to reboot and complete the upgrade process
- 8. Verify the new firmware version is 1.04b01 or later after reboot
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-44420 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-44420 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data