CVE-2023-44483
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAll versions of Apache Santuario - XML Security for Java prior to 2.2.6, 2.3.4, and 3.0.3, when using the JSR 105 API, are vulnerable to an issue where a private key may be disclosed in log files when generating an XML Signature and logging with debug level is enabled. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.2.6, 2.3.4, or 3.0.3, which fixes this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Santuario - XML Security for Java versions prior to 2.2.6, 2.3.4, and 3.0.3 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the JSR 105 API implementation. When generating XML signatures with debug-level logging enabled, the private key used for signing is written to log files, exposing cryptographic credentials that should remain confidential.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.2.6>= 2.3.0, < 2.3.4>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Santuario versionLocate the santuario-xmlsec-java library in your project dependencies (check pom.xml, build.gradle, or the JAR file name in your lib/ directory). Common artifact IDs include xmlsec, santuario-xmlsec-java, or apache-santuario-xmlsec. Note the exact version number.Affected if version is less than 2.2.6, or between 2.3.0 and 2.3.3 inclusive, or between 3.0.0 and 3.0.2 inclusive
-
Confirm debug logging is activeReview your logging configuration files (log4j.xml, log4j2.xml, logback.xml, or logging.properties) for the root logger or the org.apache.xml.security package logger. Verify the log level is set to DEBUG, TRACE, or ALL.Affected if debug-level logging (DEBUG, TRACE, or ALL) is enabled for the application or specifically for org.apache.xml.security package
-
Identify JSR 105 API usageSearch your codebase for imports of javax.xml.crypto.dsig, org.jcp.xml.dsig.internal, or usage of XMLSignatureFactory and SignedInfo classes. Look for code that creates XML signatures using the JSR 105 API.Affected if your application uses javax.xml.crypto.dsig or related JSR 105 API classes to generate XML signatures
You are affected if you run a vulnerable version of Apache Santuario AND use the JSR 105 API to sign XML documents AND have debug logging enabled, as the private key may be written to log files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.2.62.3.43.0.3
Upgrade to Apache Santuario version 2.2.6, 2.3.4, or 3.0.3. Additionally, ensure debug logging is disabled in production environments as a defense-in-depth measure.
2.2.6, 2.3.4, or 3.0.3 (depending on current major/minor version branch)
- Identify the current version of Apache Santuario - XML Security for Java in use by checking project dependencies (e.g., pom.xml, build.gradle, or JAR manifest)
- Determine which version branch is in use (2.2.x, 2.3.x, or 3.0.x)
- Upgrade to the appropriate fixed version: 2.2.6 if using 2.2.x, 2.3.4 if using 2.3.x, or 3.0.3 if using 3.0.x
- Update the dependency version in build configuration (pom.xml, build.gradle, etc.)
- Rebuild the project and verify the new version is in use
- Ensure logging configuration does not expose sensitive data at debug level as a defense-in-depth measure
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-44483 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-44483 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data