CVE-2023-4452
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in the EDR-810, EDR-G902, and EDR-G903 Series, making them vulnerable to the denial-of-service vulnerability. This vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation in the URI, potentially enabling malicious users to trigger the device reboot.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe EDR-810, EDR-G902, and EDR-G903 Series industrial Ethernet devices contain an input validation flaw in their URI handling logic. Attackers can send specially crafted HTTP requests with malicious URIs that cause the device to reboot, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.7.21< 5.7.21< 5.7.21< 5.7.21< 5.12.29< 5.12.29< 5.12.29< 5.12.29CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the exact device modelLog into the device console or web interface and locate the model name displayed in the system information or device status page. Confirm whether it is an EDR-810, EDR-G902, EDR-G903, or one of their T variants (e.g., EDR-810 2GSFP T, EDR-G903 T).Affected if The device model matches any of the following: EDR-810, EDR-G902, EDR-G903, or their T variants (EDR-810 Vpn 2gsfp T, EDR-810 2gsfp T, EDR-G902 T, EDR-G903 T).
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the device web interface and navigate to System Settings or System Information to view the firmware version. Alternatively, use the device console or CLI to run a version command if available.Affected if The firmware version is below 5.7.21 for EDR-G902 or EDR-G903 variants, or below 5.12.29 for EDR-810 variants.
-
Verify the web management interface is enabledIn the device web interface, go to Network Settings or Service Settings and confirm whether the HTTP/HTTPS web management service is turned on.Affected if The web management interface (HTTP port 80 or HTTPS port 443) is enabled and accessible.
-
Check network exposure of the web interfaceReview firewall rules, VLAN configurations, or network ACLs to determine if the device web management ports (80/443) are exposed to untrusted networks or the public internet.Affected if The web management interface is reachable from networks outside the trusted management zone.
A user is affected if they have an EDR-810, EDR-G902, or EDR-G903 device (or T variants) running firmware below 5.7.21 (for G902/G903) or below 5.12.29 (for EDR-810), with the web management interface enabled and accessible from their network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.7.215.12.29
Apply vendor-supplied firmware patches when available; until then, restrict network access to the device's web management interface using firewall rules or network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks.
Firmware 5.7.21 or higher for EDR-G902/G903 series; Firmware 5.12.29 or higher for EDR-810 series
- 1. Identify the exact model number of the Moxa EDR device (EDR-810, EDR-G902, or EDR-G903 series).
- 2. Visit the official Moxa support website at www.moxa.com to locate the firmware download section.
- 3. Download the firmware version 5.7.21 or higher for EDR-G902/G903 series devices.
- 4. Download the firmware version 5.12.29 or higher for EDR-810 series devices.
- 5. Consult the device firmware upgrade manual for proper upload procedures.
- 6. Upload the new firmware to the device through the web interface or management console.
- 7. Verify the firmware version after upgrade to confirm successful installation.
- 8. Reboot the device if not automatically performed and verify normal operation.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-4452 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-4452 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data