CVE-2023-45075
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA memory leakage vulnerability was reported in the SWSMI_Shadow DXE driver that may allow a local attacker with elevated privileges to write to NVRAM variables.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMemory leakage vulnerability in the SWSMI_Shadow DXE driver allows a local attacker with elevated privileges to write to NVRAM variables. This is a UEFI firmware issue where memory is not properly freed in the driver, potentially leading to resource exhaustion or enabling privilege escalation through NVRAM manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< o4hkt3ca< o4fkt39a< m2vkt21a< o4hkt3ca< m3gkt3da< m3gkt3da< o4zkt2ba< m3gkt3daCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your Ideacentre model numberCheck the system model label on the case or use system information tools (such as 'systeminfo' on Windows or 'dmidecode' on Linux) to confirm the exact model (e.g., C5 14imb05, 3 07ada05, G5 14imb05, etc.)Affected if The model matches one of the listed affected Ideacentre variants
-
Check the installed UEFI firmware versionAccess the UEFI/BIOS setup on boot (typically pressing F1 or Del) and look at the BIOS/UEFI version information, or use platform-specific tools like 'wmic bios get version' on Windows or 'dmidecode -s bios-version' on LinuxAffected if The firmware version is below the threshold for your specific model (o4hkt3ca, o4fkt39a, m2vkt21a, m3gkt3da, or o4zkt2ba depending on model)
-
Confirm the SWSMI_Shadow driver presenceUse UEFI shell tools or firmware inspection utilities (such as UEFItool or Chipsec) to examine the DXE drivers loaded in the firmware image and look for a driver named SWSMI_ShadowAffected if The SWSMI_Shadow DXE driver is present in the firmware and the firmware version is below the patched version
-
Verify NVRAM access capabilityConfirm you have elevated privileges and can access NVRAM variables through UEFI runtime services or tools like 'efivar' on Linux or UEFI variable enumerators on WindowsAffected if You can write to NVRAM variables with elevated privileges and the vulnerable driver is loaded
You are affected if you have a listed Ideacentre model with firmware version below the specified threshold and the SWSMI_Shadow driver is present in your UEFI firmware.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied firmware updates for the SWSMI_Shadow DXE driver. This requires obtaining a patched firmware image from the system/board manufacturer and following their documented firmware update procedure.
Firmware version o4hkt3ca or higher for C5/G5 14imb05; o4fkt39a or higher for Ideacentre 3 07ada05; m2vkt21a or higher for Ideacentre 3 07imb05; m3gkt3da or higher for Ideacentre 5/Creator 5/Gaming 5 14iob6; o4zkt2ba or higher for Ideacentre G5 14amr05
- 1. Identify the exact model number of the Lenovo Ideacentre device from the affected list
- 2. Visit the Lenovo support website (support.lenovo.com) and navigate to the Drivers & Software section for the specific model
- 3. Locate the BIOS/UEFI firmware update corresponding to the fixed version for your model: o4hkt3ca, o4fkt39a, m2vkt21a, m3gkt3da, or o4zkt2ba (depending on model)
- 4. Download the firmware update package from Lenovo's official support site
- 5. Follow Lenovo's firmware update instructions - typically this involves running the update utility or placing the file on a USB drive for BIOS flash
- 6. Ensure the device remains powered on throughout the firmware update process
- 7. After update, verify the firmware version has been successfully updated to the fixed version or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45075 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45075 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data