Xxl RpcApplication · Xxl Rpc Project

CVE-2023-45146

CRITICAL · 10.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-10-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.7.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
XXL-RPC is a high performance, distributed RPC framework. With it, a TCP server can be set up using the Netty framework and the Hessian serialization mechanism. When such a configuration is used, attackers may be able to connect to the server and provide malicious serialized objects that, once deserialized, force it to execute arbitrary code. This can be abused to take control of the machine the server is running by way of remote code execution. This issue has not been fixed.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

XXL-RPC framework using Netty with Hessian deserialization allows remote attackers to send malicious serialized objects that trigger arbitrary code execution on the server. This is a classic unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the Hessian library that has not been patched.

MitigationSince no official patch exists, immediately restrict network access to the RPC service, disable Hessian serialization if alternative is available, or disable the XXL-RPC service entirely until a fix is released.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Xxl RpcApplication
Affected:<= 1.7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify XXL-RPC installation
    Search for XXL-RPC JAR files, dependencies in pom.xml/build.gradle, or running processes named 'xxl-rpc' in your environment
    Affected if XXL-RPC framework is present in the environment
  2. Determine XXL-RPC version
    Check the version string in the XXL-RPC JAR filename, pom.xml dependency version, or build.gradle dependency declaration
    Affected if The version is 1.7.0 or lower
  3. Verify Hessian serialization is in use
    Inspect application configuration files or serialization settings for 'hessian' or HessianSerializer class usage in the XXL-RPC configuration
    Affected if Hessian serialization is enabled or configured as the serialization mechanism for XXL-RPC
  4. Confirm Netty-based RPC endpoint is exposed
    Review network listener configurations for Netty server ports bound by the XXL-RPC service, typically found in application.yml or embedded code
    Affected if A Netty-based RPC listener is exposed and accessible on the network

The environment is affected if XXL-RPC version 1.7.0 or lower is running with Hessian serialization enabled over a Netty-based RPC endpoint.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.7.0
Interim mitigation

Since no official patch exists, immediately restrict network access to the RPC service, disable Hessian serialization if alternative is available, or disable the XXL-RPC service entirely until a fix is released.

Recommended fix High confidence
  1. Implement network-level access controls to restrict who can connect to the XXL-RPC TCP server
  2. Place the XXL-RPC server behind a firewall or VPN to prevent unauthorized external connections
  3. If possible, disable the Hessian serialization mechanism and use a safer alternative
  4. Monitor for suspicious connections to the RPC server port
  5. Implement application-layer authentication if the framework supports it

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Xxl Rpc Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation24.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
52.0 hours of engineering $9,160
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45146 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45146 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data