CVE-2023-45177
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM MQ 9.0 LTS, 9.1 LTS, 9.2 LTS, 9.3 LTS and 9.3 CD is vulnerable to a denial-of-service attack due to an error within the MQ clustering logic. IBM X-Force ID: 268066.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM MQ versions 9.0 LTS, 9.1 LTS, 9.2 LTS, 9.3 LTS and 9.3 CD contain a denial-of-service vulnerability stemming from an error in the MQ clustering logic. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this flaw to cause a DoS condition affecting the clustering functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.0.0.0, < 9.0.0.21>= 9.1.0.0, < 9.1.0.18>= 9.2.0.0, < 9.2.0.20>= 9.3.0, < 9.3.4>= 9.3.0.0, <= 9.3.0.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed IBM MQ versionRun 'dspmqver' command on the queue manager host, or check the version via the MQ Explorer GUI under Queue Manager Properties, or query the qmgr.ini file for version informationAffected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 9.0.0.0 through 9.0.0.20, 9.1.0.0 through 9.1.0.17, 9.2.0.0 through 9.2.0.19, 9.3.0 through 9.3.3, or 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.0.10
-
Verify clustering is configuredCheck for cluster objects using 'DISPLAY CLUSTER' MQSC command, or inspect qmgr.ini for cluster definitions, or look for CLUSSDR and CLUSRCVR channel definitions via 'DISPLAY CHANNEL(*) TYPE(CLUSSDR)' and 'DISPLAY CHANNEL(*) TYPE(CLUSRCVR)'Affected if The queue manager is a member of any cluster (full repository, partial repository, or cluster sender/receiver channel is defined)
-
Confirm cluster channels are activeRun 'DISPLAY CHSTATUS(*) TYPE(CLUSRCVR)' and 'DISPLAY CHSTATUS(*) TYPE(CLUSSDR)' to check the status of cluster channels, or check if cluster receiver channels are in BINDING or RUNNING stateAffected if Cluster channels are in a RUNNING or BINDING state, indicating the cluster is active and accessible
You are affected if your IBM MQ version is within the affected ranges AND clustering functionality is enabled on your queue manager.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.0.0.219.1.0.189.2.0.20
Apply the IBM security patch for CVE-2023-45177 to all affected IBM MQ installations. In clustered environments, plan maintenance windows to apply patches to all queue managers in the cluster and verify clustering functionality after patching.
Upgrade to IBM MQ 9.0.0.21 (LTS), 9.1.0.18 (LTS), 9.2.0.20 (LTS), or 9.3.4 (LTS/CD) depending on your release line
- 1. Identify the current IBM MQ version by running 'dspmqver' or checking the installation directory
- 2. Determine which LTS or CD release line is in use (9.0.x, 9.1.x, 9.2.x, or 9.3.x)
- 3. Plan maintenance window for the upgrade, as queue managers will require restart
- 4. Back up all IBM MQ configuration data, including queue manager definitions, channel definitions, and ini files
- 5. Download the appropriate fix pack from IBM Fix Central (search for APAR IT42667)
- 6. Stop all queue managers gracefully using 'endmqm -w <qmgrname>' for each queue manager
- 7. Stop all IBM MQ services and listeners
- 8. Install the upgrade following IBM installation documentation for your platform (Windows, Linux, AIX, etc.)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45177 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45177 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data