CVE-2023-45248
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLocal privilege escalation due to DLL hijacking vulnerability. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Windows) before build 36497, Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Windows) before build 37391.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceLocal privilege escalation vulnerability in Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent and Cyber Protect 16 for Windows due to DLL hijacking. An attacker with local access could exploit improper DLL loading to execute malicious code with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< c23.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Acronis agent is installedCheck Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Acronis\MMS or look for Acronis installation folders in Program Files (e.g., C:\Program Files\Acronis\). Alternatively, open Programs and Features in Control Panel and search for Acronis Cyber Protect or Acronis Agent.Affected if Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent or Cyber Protect 16 for Windows is present on the system
-
Identify installed versionOpen registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Acronis\MMS\Version or check the agent's About/Properties dialog in the Acronis management console. Note the full version string and build number.Affected if Version string shows a build earlier than c23.10, or build number below 36497 (Cloud Agent) or 37391 (Cyber Protect 16)
-
Confirm DLL hijacking exposureExamine the Acronis agent service executable (commonly at C:\Program Files\Acronis\Agent\bin\*.exe) and check if the directory is writable by non-privileged users. Also review the system DLL search path order (can be checked via Process Monitor or by inspecting environment variables PATH).Affected if Any writable directory exists within the DLL search path before the Windows system directories, allowing an attacker to place a malicious DLL
-
Check service execution contextOpen Services console (services.msc), locate the Acronis agent service, right-click and select Properties. Note whether it runs under SYSTEM or a privileged account.Affected if The Acronis service runs with elevated privileges (SYSTEM, Administrator, or a service account with high privileges)
The system is affected if Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent or Cyber Protect 16 for Windows is installed with version c23.10 or earlier (build below 36497/37391 respectively), and the service runs with elevated privileges in an environment where non-privileged users can write to directories in the DLL search path.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent to build 36497 or later, and Acronis Cyber Protect 16 to build 37391 or later. Alternatively, ensure the application uses secure DLL search order paths and verify no malicious DLLs exist in writable directories within the search path.
Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent: build 36497 or later; Acronis Cyber Protect 16: build 37391 or later
- Identify the installed Acronis product: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent or Acronis Cyber Protect 16
- Check the current build version of the installed Acronis agent
- If using Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Windows), upgrade to build 36497 or later
- If using Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Windows), upgrade to build 37391 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming the new build number
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45248 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45248 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data