CVE-2023-45283
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe filepath package does not recognize paths with a \??\ prefix as special. On Windows, a path beginning with \??\ is a Root Local Device path equivalent to a path beginning with \\?\. Paths with a \??\ prefix may be used to access arbitrary locations on the system. For example, the path \??\c:\x is equivalent to the more common path c:\x. Before fix, Clean could convert a rooted path such as \a\..\??\b into the root local device path \??\b. Clean will now convert this to .\??\b. Similarly, Join(\, ??, b) could convert a seemingly innocent sequence of path elements into the root local device path \??\b. Join will now convert this to \.\??\b. In addition, with fix, IsAbs now correctly reports paths beginning with \??\ as absolute, and VolumeName correctly reports the \??\ prefix as a volume name. UPDATE: Go 1.20.11 and Go 1.21.4 inadvertently changed the definition of the volume name in Windows paths starting with \?, resulting in filepath.Clean(\?\c:) returning \?\c: rather than \?\c:\ (among other effects). The previous behavior has been restored.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Go filepath package failed to recognize Windows paths with \??\ prefix as special root local device paths (equivalent to \\?\), allowing potential access to arbitrary filesystem locations. The Clean and Join functions could convert seemingly innocuous paths like \a\..\??\b into dangerous root local device paths. Additionally, IsAbs and VolumeName functions didn't handle these paths correctly.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.20.11>= 1.21.0-0, < 1.21.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Windows environmentIdentify if the target system is running Windows. This vulnerability only affects Windows systems due to its handling of Windows-specific path prefixes.Affected if The system is running Windows and uses Go for filepath operations.
-
Identify installed Go versionRun 'go version' in the target environment or check the Go installation directory for the version number.Affected if Go version is less than 1.20.11, or greater than or equal to 1.21.0-0 but less than 1.21.4.
-
Locate filepath package usageSearch codebase for imports of 'path/filepath' and usages of Clean, Join, IsAbs, or VolumeName functions.Affected if The codebase imports and uses the filepath package functions on Windows.
-
Inspect path input sourcesReview code that passes external or user-supplied paths to filepath functions, particularly on Windows.Affected if Path inputs originate from untrusted sources or can be influenced by external input on Windows systems.
A Windows system is affected if it runs Go versions below 1.20.11 or between 1.21.0-0 and 1.21.4, and the codebase uses filepath package functions with external or user-controlled path inputs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.20.111.21.4
Upgrade to Go 1.20.11, Go 1.21.4 or later versions to receive the filepath package security fix. Test all filepath operations on Windows to ensure proper handling of paths with \??\ prefixes.
Go 1.20.11 or Go 1.21.4 or later (e.g., Go 1.21.5)
- Upgrade Go to version 1.20.11 or later (recommended: 1.21.5 or later for additional fixes)
- Verify the upgrade by running `go version` to confirm the installed version
- If using dependency management, run `go mod tidy` and `go mod verify` to ensure all dependencies are compatible
- Test filepath operations on Windows to confirm the path traversal protection is working correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45283 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45283 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data