CVE-2023-45316
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost fails to validate if a relative path is passed in /plugins/playbooks/api/v0/telemetry/run/<telem_run_id> as a telemetry run ID, allowing an attacker to use a path traversal payload that points to a different endpoint leading to a CSRF attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMattermost Playbooks plugin fails to validate the telemetry run ID parameter in /plugins/playbooks/api/v0/telemetry/run/<telem_run_id>. The endpoint accepts path traversal characters in the telem_run_id parameter without validation, allowing attackers to redirect requests to arbitrary internal endpoints and perform CSRF attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.8.14>= 8.0.0, <= 8.1.5>= 9.0.0, <= 9.0.3>= 9.1.1, <= 9.1.2>= 9.2.0, <= 9.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Mattermost Server versionCheck the server version through the system console or by querying the API endpoint /api/v4/system/config or using the mmctl command: mmctl --local config get VersionAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: <=7.8.14, 8.0.0-8.1.5, 9.0.0-9.0.3, 9.1.1-9.1.2, or 9.2.0-9.2.1
-
Confirm Playbooks plugin is enabledNavigate to Product menu > Marketplace or go to /plugins/plugin_management to list installed plugins. Verify that the Playbooks plugin is installed and enabled.Affected if The Playbooks plugin is installed and enabled on the server
-
Check for suspicious telemetry API access in logsSearch server logs for requests to /plugins/playbooks/api/v0/telemetry/run/ containing path traversal sequences like ../ or %2e%2e. Review proxy and access logs for unusual patterns.Affected if Logs show requests to the telemetry endpoint with path traversal characters in the telem_run_id parameter
-
Verify CSRF token enforcement on state-changing endpointsTest the telemetry endpoint with a crafted request containing path traversal in the telem_run_id parameter while omitting or providing an invalid CSRF token header.Affected if Requests to the telemetry endpoint succeed without requiring valid CSRF tokens in request headers
A user is affected if their Mattermost Server runs a version within the affected ranges AND has the Playbooks plugin enabled, as the vulnerability requires the plugin to be active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement strict input validation on the telem_run_id parameter to reject path traversal sequences and ensure all state-changing endpoints require valid CSRF tokens.
Minimum: 7.8.15 (for 7.x), 8.1.6 (for 8.0.x), 9.0.4 (for 9.0.x), 9.1.3 (for 9.1.x) - or migrate to latest stable release
- 1. Identify your current Mattermost Server version by navigating to System Console > About or checking the server logs
- 2. For Mattermost 7.x users: Upgrade to version 7.8.15 or later
- 3. For Mattermost 8.0.x users: Upgrade to version 8.1.6 or later
- 4. For Mattermost 9.0.x users: Upgrade to version 9.0.4 or later
- 5. For Mattermost 9.1.x users: Upgrade to version 9.1.3 or later
- 6. After upgrade, verify the /plugins/playbooks/api/v0/telemetry/run/ endpoint properly validates and rejects path traversal attempts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45316 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45316 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data