CVE-2023-45317
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe application interface allows users to perform certain actions via HTTP requests without performing any validity checks to verify the requests. This can be exploited to perform certain actions with administrative privileges if a logged-in user visits a malicious web site.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability where the application fails to validate the origin of HTTP requests. An attacker can trick a logged-in user into unknowingly sending malicious requests that execute privileged administrative actions, exploiting the trust the server places in authenticated user sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the transmitter modelLocate the device label or access the web management interface to confirm the model number matches any of the following: Exc5000gx, Exc120gx, Exc300gx, Exc1600gx, Exc2000gx, Exc1000gx, Exc3000gx, or Exc30gtAffected if The device is any of these Sielco Analog Fm Transmitter models
-
Confirm firmware versionLog into the transmitter web interface and navigate to the status or system information page to view the installed firmware versionAffected if Any firmware version is installed (all versions are affected)
-
Check if web interface is accessibleAttempt to access the transmitter web management interface over HTTP/HTTPS from a browser or using curl from the networkAffected if The web interface is reachable on the network
-
Inspect HTTP responses for CSRF protectionCapture HTTP responses from state-changing endpoints (such as configuration save, firmware update, or settings modification pages) and examine if they include anti-CSRF tokens in forms or SameSite attributes in cookiesAffected if No anti-CSRF tokens are present in forms and no SameSite cookie attributes are set on session cookies
-
Test request origin validationSubmit a state-changing request (e.g., a configuration change) using a crafted request from a different origin (or examine if the application validates the Origin or Referer headers)Affected if The application accepts and processes requests without validating the request origin
If the device is any Sielco Analog Fm Transmitter model from the affected list and its web interface is accessible without CSRF protections, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2023-45317.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) or SameSite cookie attributes on all state-changing endpoints to verify request origin and prevent cross-site request forgery.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45317 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45317 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data