SpidervplayerWordPress extension · Web Dorado

CVE-2023-45632

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-10-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.5.22 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in WebDorado SpiderVPlayer plugin <= 1.5.22 versions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Unauthenticated reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the WebDorado SpiderVPlayer WordPress plugin versions 1.5.22 and below. The vulnerability allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript scripts through unsanitized user input that gets reflected back in the application's response, potentially enabling session hijacking, credential theft, or malicious content injection.

MitigationUpdate the SpiderVPlayer plugin to a version beyond 1.5.22 if a patched release is available; otherwise, disable the plugin until a fix is released. Consider deploying a WAF with XSS filtering rules as an interim measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SpidervplayerWordPress extension
Affected:<= 1.5.22

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify SpiderVPlayer plugin is installed
    Check the WordPress plugins directory for the SpiderVPlayer folder. Navigate to wp-content/plugins/ and look for a folder containing 'spidervplayer' or 'SpiderVPlayer'. Alternatively, list installed plugins via WP CLI: wp plugin list --status=active --format=csv
    Affected if The SpiderVPlayer folder exists in the WordPress plugins directory
  2. Check installed plugin version
    If the plugin is present, locate its main PHP file (typically spidervplayer.php or similar) and read the version header comment at the top of the file. In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for the SpiderVPlayer entry to see its version number
    Affected if The displayed version number is 1.5.22 or lower
  3. Confirm plugin is active
    In WordPress admin, verify that SpiderVPlayer shows as an 'Active' plugin. Alternatively, check the wp_options table for plugin activation status or use: wp plugin list --status=active --format=csv | grep -i spiderv
    Affected if The plugin is installed and activated, making its functionality accessible to visitors
  4. Verify unauthenticated access is possible
    Since this is an unauthenticated reflected XSS, test whether the plugin responds to requests without requiring WordPress login. Attempt to access a page that would invoke the player shortcode or endpoint, such as a page containing [spidervplayer] or direct requests to plugin PHP files
    Affected if The plugin responds to requests without authentication, allowing the reflected XSS attack vector to be reachable

You are affected if SpiderVPlayer plugin is installed at version 1.5.22 or below AND is active, meaning unauthenticated attackers can inject malicious scripts through unsanitized user input processed by the plugin.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.5.22
Interim mitigation

Update the SpiderVPlayer plugin to a version beyond 1.5.22 if a patched release is available; otherwise, disable the plugin until a fix is released. Consider deploying a WAF with XSS filtering rules as an interim measure.

Fix this in Spidervplayer Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45632 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45632 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data