Html5 MapsWordPress extension · Fla Shop
CVE-2023-45650
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Fla-shop.Com HTML5 Maps plugin <= 1.7.1.4 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Fla-shop.Com HTML5 Maps plugin versions 1.7.1.4 and below allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended state-changing actions via crafted requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Html5 MapsWordPress extension
<= 1.7.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of Fla Shop Html5 MapsLocate the plugin file (typically in the plugin directory or version file such as plugin.php, config.php, or a changelog/readme file) and read the version number. Search for strings like 'Version:', 'version', or check the plugin header in the main PHP file.Affected if The displayed version is 1.7.1.4 or lower.
-
Check for admin/dashboard accessVerify if you have access to the plugin's administrative interface or settings panel where state-changing operations (such as map configuration changes, user management, or data exports) can be performed.Affected if You have authenticated access to state-changing plugin features.
-
Inspect state-changing forms for anti-CSRF tokensView the HTML source of forms that perform state-changing actions (e.g., settings updates, map edits, data modifications). Look for hidden input fields containing tokens (such as 'csrf_token', 'nonce', 'token', '_wpnonce', or similar) within the <form> tags.Affected if State-changing forms lack anti-CSRF token fields, or tokens are missing from POST/PUT requests.
-
Verify Origin or Referer header validationIntercept a state-changing request using browser developer tools or a proxy. Check if the server validates the Origin or Referer header and rejects requests from unexpected domains.Affected if The server accepts state-changing requests without validating Origin/Referer headers, or these headers are not checked server-side.
You are affected if the installed plugin version is 1.7.1.4 or lower AND state-changing operations lack anti-CSRF token validation and Origin/Referer header checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing operations and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
Fix this in Html5 Maps
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45650 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45650 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data