BrpcApplication · Apache

CVE-2023-45757

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-10-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.6.1 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Security vulnerability in Apache bRPC <=1.6.0 on all platforms allows attackers to inject XSS code to the builtin rpcz page. An attacker that can send http request to bRPC server with rpcz enabled can inject arbitrary XSS code to the builtin rpcz page. Solution (choose one of three): 1. upgrade to bRPC > 1.6.0, download link: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/brpc/1.6.1/ 2. If you are using an old version of bRPC and hard to upgrade, you can apply this patch:  https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/2411 3. disable rpcz feature

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache bRPC versions 1.6.0 and below allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript code into the builtin rpcz (RPC tracing) page via specially crafted HTTP requests when the rpcz feature is enabled.

MitigationUpgrade to bRPC version 1.6.1 or later; alternatively, apply the patch from GitHub PR #2411 or disable the rpcz feature if not required.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
BrpcApplication
Affected:< 1.6.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed bRPC version
    Run 'brpc --version' or check the library binary version (often via 'ldd' or file metadata). If built from source, check the version tag in the source directory.
    Affected if version is 1.6.0 or below (any version less than 1.6.1)
  2. Confirm rpcz feature is enabled
    Locate the bRPC server configuration file or startup script. Look for the flag '--enable_rpcz=true' or 'rpcz_enabled=true' in the server launch parameters or configuration.
    Affected if rpcz feature is explicitly enabled in the server configuration or startup flags
  3. Verify rpcz endpoint is accessible
    Attempt to access the rpcz page via HTTP: curl http://<server_address>/rpcz . Check if the page loads and returns tracing data.
    Affected if the rpcz endpoint responds (indicating the feature is active and exposed)

You are affected if your bRPC version is below 1.6.1 AND the rpcz feature is enabled and accessible on your server.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.6.1 or later
Fixed in 1.6.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to bRPC version 1.6.1 or later; alternatively, apply the patch from GitHub PR #2411 or disable the rpcz feature if not required.

Recommended fix High confidence

bRPC 1.6.1

  1. Download bRPC version 1.6.1 from the official Apache distribution at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/brpc/1.6.1/
  2. Extract the source archive and follow the build instructions for your platform
  3. Rebuild your application or service that uses the bRPC library with the new version
  4. Restart the bRPC server to load the updated library
  5. Verify the rpcz page is accessible and functions correctly with the new version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Brpc Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45757 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45757 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data