Remote Application ServerApplication · Parallels

CVE-2023-45894

CRITICAL · 10.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-12-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 19.2.23975 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Remote Application Server in Parallels RAS before 19.2.23975 does not segment virtualized applications from the server, which allows a remote attacker to achieve remote code execution via standard kiosk breakout techniques.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Remote Application Server in Parallels RAS prior to version 19.2.23975 lacks proper isolation between virtualized applications and the underlying server, allowing attackers to escape kiosk-mode restrictions and execute arbitrary code on the host system.

MitigationUpgrade Parallels RAS to version 19.2.23975 or later to obtain the segmentation fix; verify kiosk breakout is no longer possible post-update.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Remote Application ServerApplication
Affected:< 19.2.23975

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Parallels RAS installation
    Check installed programs or services for Parallels Remote Application Server or Parallels RAS
    Affected if Parallels RAS is not present on the system, the vulnerability does not apply
  2. Determine installed version
    Locate the Parallels RAS version through the product Help > About menu, or check the version reported by the Parallels RAS console or service
    Affected if The installed version is less than 19.2.23975 and Parallels RAS is present
  3. Confirm RAS Remote Application Server feature is in use
    Check if the Remote Application Server role or kiosk-mode published applications are configured and active on the host
    Affected if Remote Application Server functionality is enabled and the version is below 19.2.23975
  4. Assess network exposure
    Determine if the RAS server is accessible from network paths that could permit an attacker to reach the kiosk-mode interface
    Affected if The RAS server is network-accessible and the version is below 19.2.23975

A system is affected if Parallels RAS version is below 19.2.23975 and the Remote Application Server or kiosk-mode feature is enabled and accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 19.2.23975 or later
Fixed in 19.2.23975
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Parallels RAS to version 19.2.23975 or later to obtain the segmentation fix; verify kiosk breakout is no longer possible post-update.

Recommended fix High confidence

Parallels Remote Application Server 19.2.23975 or later

  1. Identify the current Parallels Remote Application Server version installed in your environment
  2. Create a full backup of the RAS configuration and any associated virtualized application data
  3. Download Parallels RAS version 19.2.23975 or later from the official Parallels website
  4. Follow the standard Parallels upgrade procedure: stop RAS services, run the installer, and complete the upgrade
  5. After upgrade, verify the version number matches 19.2.23975 or higher
  6. Test that virtualized applications run in properly segmented/isolated mode
  7. Confirm that standard kiosk breakout techniques are no longer effective
Caveat Review Parallels release notes for version 19.2.x for any configuration or feature changes that may affect existing deployments

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Remote Application Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45894 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45894 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data