Duplicate ThemeWordPress extension · Mullerdigital
CVE-2023-46204
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Muller Digital Inc. Duplicate Theme plugin <= 0.1.6 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Duplicate Theme plugin by Muller Digital Inc. affecting versions 0.1.6 and below. The vulnerability allows attackers to induce authenticated administrators to perform unintended actions such as duplicating themes without their consent.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Duplicate ThemeWordPress extension
<= 0.1.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin Dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Mullerdigital Duplicate Theme' or 'Duplicate Theme' by Muller Digital Inc.Affected if The plugin appears in the list of installed plugins
-
Check installed versionIn the Plugins list, locate the Duplicate Theme plugin and note the version number displayed below the plugin nameAffected if Version is 0.1.6 or lower (the version displayed shows 0.1.6 or any lower version number)
-
Verify plugin is activeIn the Plugins list, confirm the plugin shows as 'Active' under its statusAffected if Plugin is installed and active - an authenticated administrator session can be targeted
-
Test CSRF protection absenceAttempt to access the theme duplication function by reviewing plugin code or observing admin actions - the vulnerability exists if the plugin does not use WordPress nonces for the duplication action (check plugin source files for wp_nonce_field or check_admin_referer calls)Affected if No nonce validation is found in the theme duplication code - the duplication functionality works without requiring a valid security token
User is affected if Mullerdigital Duplicate Theme plugin version 0.1.6 or below is installed and active in WordPress, and the plugin lacks proper nonce validation for theme duplication operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF protection using WordPress nonces for all state-changing operations, validate Origin/Referer headers, and consider adding SameSite cookie attributes.
Fix this in Duplicate Theme
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-46204 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-46204 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data