CVE-2023-46227
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache InLong. This issue affects Apache InLong: from 1.4.0 through 1.8.0, the attacker can use \t to bypass. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 1.9.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it. [1] https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/8814
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a deserialization vulnerability in Apache InLong (versions 1.4.0-1.8.0) where an attacker can use tab characters (\t) to bypass validation checks. The vulnerability allows deserialization of untrusted data, which could enable remote code execution or other attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.4.0, < 1.9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Apache InLong installation and versionLocate the InLong installation directory and identify the version file or check the version from the package manager. Typical locations include /opt/inlong or /usr/local/inlong. Look for a VERSION file or check the pom.xml if built from source.Affected if The installed version is between 1.4.0 and 1.9.0 (exclusive of 1.9.0).
-
Identify deserialization-enabled componentsReview the InLong configuration files (typically in conf/ or config/ directories) for components that handle serialization or deserialization. Focus on settings related to audit, message queue, or data ingestion endpoints that accept external data.Affected if Components with deserialization capabilities are enabled and accessible over the network.
-
Check API endpoint exposureExamine the exposed API endpoints and web services. Look at configuration files such as application.yml, application.properties, or any REST-related configurations to identify endpoints that handle incoming data.Affected if Deserialization endpoints are exposed without proper network segmentation or authentication.
-
Inspect validation and security configurationsReview security-related configuration files for deserialization allowlists, blocklists, or validation rules. Check whether the validation can be bypassed using special characters like tab characters (\t).Affected if Deserialization security controls rely on validation that could be bypassed with tab characters or similar input.
You are affected if Apache InLong version 1.4.0 through 1.8.0 is installed and has deserialization-enabled components exposed that process untrusted input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.9.0
Upgrade Apache InLong to version 1.9.0 or apply the cherry-pick from GitHub PR #8814.
1.9.0
- 1. Back up all existing InLong data, configuration files, and database schemas
- 2. Stop all running InLong services and dependencies
- 3. Download Apache InLong version 1.9.0 from the official Apache repository
- 4. Install version 1.9.0 following the standard installation process
- 5. Restore or migrate configuration files from the backup to the new installation
- 6. Start InLong services and verify all components are running correctly
- 7. Validate that the vulnerability is resolved by testing deserialization functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,256.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-46227 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-46227 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data