CVE-2023-46319
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWALLIX Bastion 9.x before 9.0.9 and 10.x before 10.0.5 allows unauthenticated access to sensitive information by bypassing access control on a network access administration web interface.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceWALLIX Bastion versions 9.x before 9.0.9 and 10.x before 10.0.5 contain an access control bypass vulnerability in the network access administration web interface, allowing unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication and access sensitive information without credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.0.9>= 10.0, < 10.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WALLIX Bastion installation and versionCheck the installed version by examining the product's about page, running 'wabctl --version' or 'wabadm --version' command line tools, or reviewing /opt/wallix/bastion/etc/version file if accessibleAffected if Version is less than 9.0.9 or between 10.0.0 and 10.0.4 (inclusive)
-
Confirm network access administration web interface is enabledVerify if the network access administration web interface is accessible. This is typically exposed on port 443 or 8443 via HTTPS. Check for the presence of /admin/network/ or similar admin endpointsAffected if The web administration interface is exposed and accessible without authentication
-
Verify authentication is required for admin endpointsAttempt to access the network access administration interface directly without credentials. Try accessing common admin paths such as /admin/network/access/ or /api/v1/admin/networkAffected if Authentication is not enforced and sensitive information or admin functions are accessible without credentials
You are affected if WALLIX Bastion version is below 9.0.9 or between 10.0.0 and 10.0.4, and the network access administration web interface is accessible without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.0.910.0.5
Upgrade WALLIX Bastion to version 9.0.9 or 10.0.5 or later to remediate the access control bypass vulnerability.
9.0.9 for 9.x branches; 10.0.5 for 10.x branches
- Upgrade WALLIX Bastion 9.x to version 9.0.9 or later
- If running 10.x, upgrade to version 10.0.5 or later
- After upgrade, verify the network access administration web interface requires proper authentication
- Confirm the access control bypass vulnerability is no longer present
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,440.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-46319 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-46319 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data