SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2023-46453

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Certain GL.iNet devices with 4.x firmware allow authentication bypass (resulting in administrative control of the device) via a username that is both a valid SQL statement and a valid regular expression. For example, this affects version 4.3.7 on GL-MT3000 GL-AR300M GL-B1300 GL-AX1800 GL-AR750S GL-MT2500 GL-AXT1800 GL-X3000 and GL-SFT1200.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

GL.iNet routers with 4.x firmware contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where the username input field improperly processes values that function as both valid SQL statements and valid regular expressions. This allows attackers to manipulate authentication logic and gain administrative access without valid credentials.

MitigationImmediately restrict administrative interface exposure to trusted networks, disable remote management if enabled, and apply vendor firmware updates when available for all affected GL.iNet device models.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify GL.iNet device on network
    Access your router or network device management interface and confirm the device manufacturer is GL.iNet. Check the device model number and label.
    Affected if Device is a GL.iNet branded router or access point
  2. Check firmware version
    Log into the device admin panel and navigate to System > Firmware or System > Overview to view the installed firmware version. Compare against the affected 4.x range, noting that 4.3.7 is specifically listed as affected.
    Affected if Firmware version starts with 4.x (for example, 4.0.0 through 4.3.7 and potentially later 4.x versions)
  3. Verify remote administrative access is enabled
    In the admin panel, go to System > Administration or Network > Firewall settings. Check if Remote Web Management or Allow remote access is enabled, and note the allowed IP ranges or if it permits any IP (0.0.0.0).
    Affected if Remote administrative access is enabled and accessible from untrusted networks
  4. Confirm admin interface is internet-facing
    Use an external IP or VPN test from outside your local network to determine if the GL.iNet admin login page (typically on port 80/443) responds to remote requests. Check router port forwarding or firewall rules for port 80/443 open to WAN.
    Affected if Admin interface responds to requests from outside the local network
  5. Review active admin sessions
    In the admin panel, check System > Administration > Active Sessions or similar log section for any administrative sessions you do not recognize, especially sessions from unexpected IP addresses or with administrator privileges.
    Affected if Unexpected or unauthorized admin sessions are active or logged

A GL.iNet device running 4.x firmware with remote web management enabled and exposed to untrusted networks is likely vulnerable to this authentication bypass.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Immediately restrict administrative interface exposure to trusted networks, disable remote management if enabled, and apply vendor firmware updates when available for all affected GL.iNet device models.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-46453 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-46453 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data