CVE-2023-46604
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Java OpenWire protocol marshaller is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution. This vulnerability may allow a remote attacker with network access to either a Java-based OpenWire broker or client to run arbitrary shell commands by manipulating serialized class types in the OpenWire protocol to cause either the client or the broker (respectively) to instantiate any class on the classpath. Users are recommended to upgrade both brokers and clients to version 5.15.16, 5.16.7, 5.17.6, or 5.18.3 which fixes this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Java OpenWire protocol marshaller contains a deserialization vulnerability that allows remote attackers to manipulate serialized class types in the OpenWire protocol, causing affected brokers or clients to instantiate arbitrary classes on the classpath and execute shell commands remotely.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.15.16>= 5.16.0, < 5.16.7>= 5.17.0, < 5.17.6>= 5.18.0, < 5.18.3< 5.15.16>= 5.16.0, < 5.16.7>= 5.17.0, < 5.17.6>= 5.18.0, < 5.18.3= 10.0= 11.0all versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache ActiveMQ installation and versionRun 'activemq --version' or check the version file in the ActiveMQ installation directory (typically bin/activemq or lib/activemq-*.jar). On Debian, check installed packages with 'dpkg -l | grep activemq'Affected if The installed version is less than 5.15.16, or between 5.16.0-5.16.6, 5.17.0-5.17.5, or 5.18.0-5.18.2
-
Verify OpenWire protocol is enabledCheck the ActiveMQ XML configuration file (activemq.xml) for the OpenWire transport connector. Look for <transportConnector> elements with 'openwire' in the URI (e.g., 'tcp://0.0.0.0:61616')Affected if OpenWire transport connector is present and active (this is the default setting)
-
Confirm network exposure of the brokerReview the bind address in the transport connector URI. Check iptables rules or firewall configuration for open ports 61616 (default OpenWire) and 8161 (web console). Inspect network interfaces with 'ip addr' or 'netstat -tlnp'Affected if The OpenWire port (typically 61616) is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet
-
Check for NetApp E Series products using ActiveMQFor NetApp E Series Santricity Unified Manager, Web Services Proxy, or Santricity Storage Plugin, identify if the Java components bundle ActiveMQ. Check installed software versions and running Java processes related to these productsAffected if Any version of the listed NetApp products is running (they all include vulnerable ActiveMQ components)
-
Inspect Java process for ActiveMQ classpathRun 'ps aux | grep activemq' to find the Java process, then check the classpath with 'jcmd <pid> VM.flags' or examine startup scripts in /etc/init.d/ or the bin/ directory for JAR referencesAffected if The process runs any JAR file from the affected ActiveMQ version ranges
You are affected if you run any Apache ActiveMQ version below 5.15.16, 5.16.0-5.16.6, 5.17.0-5.17.5, or 5.18.0-5.18.2, or any NetApp E Series product, AND the OpenWire protocol is enabled and network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.15.165.16.75.17.6
Upgrade all Java-based OpenWire brokers and clients to versions 5.15.16, 5.16.7, 5.17.6, or 5.18.3; restrict network access to OpenWire ports as an interim control until patching is complete.
Upgrade to Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.3 (or 5.15.16, 5.16.7, or 5.17.6 depending on stability requirements)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Apache ActiveMQ version by checking the 'activemq-all' JAR manifest or running 'activemq --version'
- 2. Stop the ActiveMQ broker or client service before upgrading
- 3. For Maven-based Java clients, update the dependency in pom.xml: change <version> to one of the fixed versions (5.15.16, 5.16.7, 5.17.6, or 5.18.3) - e.g., <artifactId>activemq-client</artifactId> <version>5.18.3</version>
- 4. For standalone broker installations, download the fixed release from the Apache ActiveMQ archives (activemq.apache.org/download.html) - specifically version 5.15.16, 5.16.7, 5.17.6, or 5.18.3
- 5. Replace the old activemq-all.jar or activemq-client.jar with the new version from the fixed release
- 6. If using OpenWire protocol, ensure the new client/broker is properly configured and restart the service
- 7. Verify the upgrade by checking the version number and testing that the broker/client starts successfully
- 8. Review release notes for the chosen version to check for any configuration changes required
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-46604 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-46604 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data