CVE-2023-46606
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Team AtomChat AtomChat atomchat allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects AtomChat: from n/a through <= 1.1.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAtomChat <= 1.1.4 contains a missing authorization vulnerability due to incorrectly configured access control security levels. This allows attackers to access protected resources or perform actions without proper authentication/authorization checks, exploiting the misconfigured security settings.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AtomChat installationSearch for AtomChat files, directories, or installed packages in the environment. Common locations include web server directories (htdocs, www, public_html), application folders, or package managers.Affected if AtomChat is installed on the system
-
Determine installed AtomChat versionCheck version files (version.json, version.php, package.json), footer/about pages, or administrative panels that display the software version. Compare the found version to the affected range: <= 1.1.4Affected if The installed version is 1.1.4 or any earlier version
-
Review access control configurationLocate and inspect AtomChat configuration files related to security settings, permissions, or access control levels. These may be named config.php, settings.php, security.json, or similar. Look for security_level, access_control, or authorization-related settings.Affected if Access control security levels are set to a low or misconfigured value (e.g., none, disabled, or permissive)
-
Test protected endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access protected AtomChat resources, admin functions, or API endpoints without authentication credentials or with invalid/sessionless requests. Compare behavior against expected authorization requirements.Affected if Protected resources are accessible without proper authentication or authorization tokens
The environment is affected if AtomChat version 1.1.4 or earlier is installed AND access control security levels are misconfigured, allowing unauthenticated access to protected resources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReview and properly configure access control security levels in AtomChat, ensuring all protected endpoints and actions enforce appropriate authorization checks before granting access.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-46606 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-46606 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data