CVE-2023-46647
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper privilege management in all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server allows users with authorized access to the management console with an editor role to escalate their privileges by making requests to the endpoint used for bootstrapping the instance. This vulnerability affected GitHub Enterprise Server version 3.8.0 and above and was fixed in version 3.8.12, 3.9.6, 3.10.3, and 3.11.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA privilege escalation vulnerability exists in GitHub Enterprise Server where users with management console access and an 'editor' role can make requests to the bootstrapping endpoint to elevate their privileges beyond what the editor role should permit. This allows unauthorized access to administrative functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.8.0, < 3.8.12>= 3.9.0, < 3.9.6>= 3.10.0, < 3.10.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check GitHub Enterprise Server versionAccess the Management Console or use administrative SSH to run `ghe-version` command. The version is also displayed on the /setup page or in the admin dashboard under 'About' section.Affected if Installed version falls within 3.8.0 to 3.8.11, 3.9.0 to 3.9.5, or 3.10.0 to 3.10.2.
-
Verify management console access configurationCheck if the Management Console is enabled by reviewing authentication settings at /site-admin/settings or by checking the management_console settings via administrative API.Affected if Management Console is accessible and enabled.
-
Identify users with editor roleReview user roles in the site admin dashboard under /site-admin/users or use the administrative API to list users and their role assignments. Specifically look for users assigned the 'editor' role.Affected if Any user account has been assigned the 'editor' role.
-
Audit access logs for bootstrapping endpoint requestsReview HTTP access logs or audit logs for requests to the bootstrapping endpoint (typically /setup/api or similar initialization endpoints). Check for requests from editor role users that attempt to access administrative functions.Affected if Logs show requests from editor role users to the bootstrapping endpoint accessing privileged functions.
A user is affected if their GitHub Enterprise Server version is 3.8.0-3.8.11, 3.9.0-3.9.5, or 3.10.0-3.10.2 AND the management console is accessible with users assigned the editor role.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.8.123.9.63.10.3
Update GitHub Enterprise Server to version 3.8.12, 3.9.6, 3.10.3, or 3.11.0 to patch this vulnerability. As a temporary measure, limit management console access and monitor for unauthorized bootstrapping requests.
Upgrade to 3.8.12, 3.9.6, 3.10.3, or 3.11.0 (3.11.0 recommended)
- 1. Back up your GitHub Enterprise Server instance data before proceeding with the upgrade.
- 2. Review the GitHub Enterprise Server release notes for your target version to understand any required migration steps.
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version from GitHub (3.8.12, 3.9.6, 3.10.3, or 3.11.0).
- 4. Follow GitHub's standard upgrade procedure for your installation method (VM or cloud deployment).
- 5. Verify the upgrade completed successfully by accessing the management console.
- 6. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by ensuring editor-role users can no longer access the bootstrapping endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-46647 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-46647 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data