ConnectApplication · Adobe

CVE-2023-4665

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-09-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 9.0 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Incorrect Execution-Assigned Permissions vulnerability in Saphira Saphira Connect allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects Saphira Connect: before 9.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Saphira Connect versions before version 9 due to incorrect execution-assigned permissions. The flaw allows authenticated users to gain elevated privileges beyond what their assigned permissions should permit, likely through manipulation of runtime permission checks.

MitigationUpgrade Saphira Connect to version 9 or later to resolve the incorrect permission assignment vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ConnectApplication
Affected:< 9.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Adobe Connect version
    Locate the Adobe Connect installation and retrieve its version number from the application, typically found in the application properties, about page, or installer information
    Affected if The installed version is any release prior to version 9.0 (e.g., 8.x, 7.x, etc.)
  2. Confirm Saphira Connect component version
    Verify the Saphira Connect component version specifically, as this is the component where the vulnerability exists
    Affected if The Saphira Connect version is below 9.0 regardless of the main application version
  3. Verify user authentication is enabled
    Check if Adobe Connect user authentication is configured and active, since this is a vulnerability affecting authenticated users
    Affected if User authentication is enabled and users can log into the system
  4. Review user permission assignments
    Examine the permission model to see if runtime permission checks can be manipulated through the application interface or logs
    Affected if Users have permissions assigned through the execution-assigned permission system that could be bypassed
  5. Check for unexpected privilege elevation
    Monitor logs and audit records for instances where users performed actions beyond their assigned permission level
    Affected if Evidence exists of users accessing features or data outside their assigned permission scope

The environment is affected if Adobe Connect or Saphira Connect version is below 9.0 and user authentication is enabled, as the vulnerability allows privilege escalation through manipulation of runtime permission checks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 9.0 or later
Fixed in 9.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Saphira Connect to version 9 or later to resolve the incorrect permission assignment vulnerability.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Version 9.0 or later

  1. Identify the current installed version of Saphira Connect
  2. Download Saphira Connect version 9.0 or later from the official vendor source
  3. Create a backup of the current Saphira Connect configuration and data
  4. Stop the Saphira Connect service before upgrading
  5. Install version 9.0 or later following the vendor's upgrade documentation
  6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number
  7. Restart the Saphira Connect service
  8. Test that the privilege escalation vulnerability is no longer present

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Connect Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,580
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-4665 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-4665 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data