CVE-2023-46667
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Fleet Server >= v8.10.0 and < v8.10.3 where Agent enrolment tokens are being inserted into the Fleet Server’s log file in plain text. These enrolment tokens could allow someone to enrol an agent into an agent policy, and potentially use that to retrieve other secrets in the policy including for Elasticsearch and third-party services. Alternatively a threat actor could potentially enrol agents to the clusters and send arbitrary events to Elasticsearch.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAgent enrollment tokens are being written in plain text to Fleet Server log files starting in v8.10.0. An attacker with log file access can retrieve these tokens and use them to enroll agents into agent policies, potentially exposing stored secrets for Elasticsearch and third-party integrations, or injecting arbitrary events into Elasticsearch.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.10.0, < 8.10.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Fleet Server versionQuery your Fleet Server installation for its version number (e.g., using fleetctl or through the Fleet UI/API)Affected if The installed version is 8.10.0, 8.10.1, or 8.10.2 (i.e., >= 8.10.0 and < 8.10.3)
-
Locate Fleet Server log filesIdentify where Fleet Server logs are written in your environment (default locations or custom paths as configured)Affected if Fleet Server logs exist and the server version is in the affected range
-
Search logs for enrollment token patternsInspect Fleet Server log files for occurrences of enrollment tokens - look for strings matching enrollment token formats or API keys that may have been logged during agent enrollment operationsAffected if Plain text enrollment tokens or API keys are found in the logs
-
Review agent enrollment activityCheck Fleet audit logs or agent enrollment records for any unauthorized or unexpected agent enrollments that occurred during the affected version timeframeAffected if New agents were enrolled that you did not initiate or recognize
You are affected if Fleet Server version is 8.10.0 through 8.10.2 AND plain text enrollment tokens are present in logs or unauthorized enrollments occurred.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.10.3
Upgrade Fleet Server to v8.10.3 or later to receive the fix. Additionally, rotate any enrollment tokens that may have been exposed in logs since v8.10.0 as a precautionary measure.
Fleet Server 8.10.3 or later
- 1. Identify the current Fleet Server version in use (e.g., via 'fleetctl version' or Kibana > Fleet > Settings)
- 2. Confirm the installed version is >= 8.10.0 and < 8.10.3 to determine if the system is vulnerable
- 3. Review the Elastic upgrade documentation for Fleet Server at https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/fleet/current/upgrade-fleet.html
- 4. Create a backup of current Fleet Server configuration, policies, and enrolment tokens
- 5. Perform a test upgrade in a staging environment to verify compatibility
- 6. During a scheduled maintenance window, upgrade Fleet Server to version 8.10.3 or later
- 7. After upgrade, verify the fix by checking that enrolment tokens are no longer written to log files (inspect recent Fleet Server logs)
- 8. Regenerate any enrolment tokens that may have been exposed in logs prior to the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-46667 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-46667 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data