CVE-2023-46754
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe admin panel for Obl.ong before 1.1.2 allows authorization bypass because the email OTP feature accepts arbitrary numerical values.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe admin panel of Obl.ong before version 1.1.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in its email OTP authentication mechanism. The system accepts arbitrary numerical values during OTP validation instead of properly verifying the one-time password, allowing unauthorized access to the admin panel.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Obl.ong Admin versionLocate the version file, about page, or run a version command provided by the software documentation. Compare the version number to the affected range (anything below 1.1.2).Affected if Installed version is below 1.1.2
-
Confirm admin panel is in useCheck if the Obl.ong admin panel interface is accessible or configured in the environment. Look for admin login endpoints or configuration files that indicate admin panel setup.Affected if The admin panel interface is deployed and accessible
-
Verify email OTP authentication is enabledExamine the authentication configuration files or settings to determine if email OTP is configured as the login method for the admin panel. Look for OTP-related settings, email authentication modules, or MFA configurations.Affected if Email OTP authentication is enabled as the admin login mechanism
Environment is affected if Obl.ong Admin version is below 1.1.2 AND the admin panel with email OTP authentication is deployed and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.2
Upgrade to Obl.ong version 1.1.2 or later which contains the corrected OTP validation logic.
1.1.2
- Backup your current Admin installation before making any changes
- Upgrade the Admin component to version 1.1.2 or later
- After upgrading, verify that the email OTP feature now properly validates codes rather than accepting arbitrary numerical values
- Test that legitimate OTP authentication still functions correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-46754 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-46754 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data