SugarcrmApplication

CVE-2023-46815

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-10-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 12.0.4 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in SugarCRM 12 before 12.0.4 and 13 before 13.0.2. An Unrestricted File Upload vulnerability has been identified in the Notes module. By using a crafted request, custom PHP code can be injected via the Notes module because of missing input validation. An attacker with regular user privileges can exploit this.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

An Unrestricted File Upload vulnerability in SugarCRM's Notes module (versions 12.x < 12.0.4 and 13.x < 13.0.2) allows authenticated regular users to inject custom PHP code due to missing input validation on file uploads. The attacker can upload malicious PHP files through the Notes functionality, potentially achieving remote code execution.

MitigationUpgrade SugarCRM to version 12.0.4 or 13.0.2 or later. Additionally, implement strict file type validation and disable PHP execution in upload directories as defense-in-depth measures.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SugarcrmApplication
Affected:>= 12.0.0, < 12.0.4= 13.0.0= 13.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed SugarCRM version
    Access the SugarCRM About page (typically /index.php?module=About) or check the version.php config file in the application root directory
    Affected if The installed version is 12.0.0 through 12.0.3, or 13.0.0 through 13.0.1 (versions below 12.0.4 or 13.0.2)
  2. Verify Notes module is enabled
    Log in as an administrator and navigate to Admin > Module Loader or check the module visibility settings for the Notes module
    Affected if The Notes module is enabled and visible to regular (non-admin) users in the application
  3. Confirm regular user access to Notes upload feature
    Log in as a regular (non-admin) user and attempt to access the Notes module. Check if the user can create a new Note with a file attachment
    Affected if Regular authenticated users can access the Notes module and the file upload/create functionality
  4. Inspect upload directory PHP execution settings
    Locate the directory where uploaded files are stored (check config.php or upload.php for the upload_dir path). Verify that .htaccess or server configuration prevents PHP execution in that directory
    Affected if PHP files can be executed from the upload directory (no restrictions in place)

You are affected if your SugarCRM version is below 12.0.4 or 13.0.2 AND the Notes module is enabled with file upload access available to regular users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 12.0.4 or later
Fixed in 12.0.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade SugarCRM to version 12.0.4 or 13.0.2 or later. Additionally, implement strict file type validation and disable PHP execution in upload directories as defense-in-depth measures.

Recommended fix High confidence

12.0.4 or later for 12.x branches; 13.0.2 or later for 13.x branches

  1. Create a complete backup of the SugarCRM database and files
  2. Upgrade SugarCRM 12.x to version 12.0.4 or later
  3. If running 13.0.0 or 13.0.1, upgrade to version 13.0.2 or later
  4. After upgrade, verify the Notes module functionality works correctly
  5. Confirm the upgrade was successful by checking the SugarCRM version in About section

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Sugarcrm Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-46815 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-46815 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data