Enterprise LinuxOperating system · Redhat

CVE-2023-46848

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-11-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.4 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Squid is vulnerable to Denial of Service, where a remote attacker can perform DoS by sending ftp:// URLs in HTTP Request messages or constructing ftp:// URLs from FTP Native input.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Squid proxy server contains a denial of service vulnerability where remote attackers can send specially crafted ftp:// URLs embedded in HTTP request messages or construct ftp:// URLs from FTP Native input, causing the service to become unavailable.

MitigationUpgrade Squid to the latest version or apply the vendor-supplied patch. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting or filtering FTP URL processing at the proxy boundary.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Enterprise LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 9.0
Enterprise Linux EusOperating system
Affected:= 9.2
Enterprise Linux Server AusOperating system
Affected:= 9.2
Enterprise Linux Server TusOperating system
Affected:= 9.2
SquidApplication
Affected:>= 5.0.3, < 6.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Squid installation and version
    Run 'squid -v' or 'rpm -q squid' to get the installed version number
    Affected if Version is 5.0.3 or higher but lower than 6.4
  2. Confirm the vulnerable FTP URL handling is active
    Check if Squid is configured to process FTP requests - review squid.conf for ftp* directives or verify FTP proxy access is allowed
    Affected if FTP URL processing or FTP Native input handling is enabled in Squid configuration
  3. Verify Squid service is running
    Run 'systemctl status squid' or 'ps aux | grep squid' to confirm the service is active
    Affected if Squid is running and accepting requests
  4. Check for recent indicators of DoS
    Review Squid access logs and system logs for crashes, timeouts, or excessive resource usage related to FTP URL requests
    Affected if Logs show service degradation or crashes when processing FTP URLs

A system is affected if it runs Squid version 5.0.3 or higher but below version 6.4, has FTP URL processing enabled, and the Squid service is active.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.4 or later
Fixed in 6.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Squid to the latest version or apply the vendor-supplied patch. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting or filtering FTP URL processing at the proxy boundary.

Recommended fix High confidence

Squid 6.4 or later (via Red Hat Enterprise Linux update channels)

  1. 1. Update the system package cache: sudo dnf check-update
  2. 2. Upgrade Squid to the fixed version: sudo dnf update squid
  3. 3. Verify the installed version matches the fixed release (6.4 or later): squid -v
  4. 4. Restart the Squid service to apply the update: sudo systemctl restart squid
  5. 5. Verify the service is running correctly: sudo systemctl status squid
Caveat Upgrading Squid may introduce changes to configuration syntax or behavior; review the Squid 6.0 release notes for any breaking changes before deploying to production

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Enterprise Linux Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-46848 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-46848 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data