Jeecg BootApplication · Jeecg

CVE-2023-47467

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-11-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Directory Traversal vulnerability in jeecg-boot v.3.6.0 allows a remote privileged attacker to obtain sensitive information via the file directory structure.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A directory traversal vulnerability in jeecg-boot v.3.6.0 allows authenticated privileged users to access files and directories outside the web root folder through manipulation of file path parameters, potentially exposing sensitive system configuration files, credentials, or application source code.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of jeecg-boot if available; otherwise implement strict input validation and path sanitization on all file-handling endpoints, and ensure file access is restricted to intended directories via whitelisting.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Jeecg BootApplication
Affected:= 3.6.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed jeecg-boot version
    Locate the version identifier in the application's configuration files, pom.xml, or application startup logs. Many Java applications expose version information in the manifest or welcome pages.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 3.6.0
  2. Verify if file upload or download features are enabled
    Inspect the application codebase or configuration for file handling endpoints such as /upload, /download, /file, or similar REST controllers that accept file path parameters.
    Affected if File handling endpoints that accept path parameters exist and are accessible to the application
  3. Confirm authentication is required for file operations
    Review the application's security configuration to verify that file-related endpoints require valid authentication. Check if anonymous access is permitted on file handling routes.
    Affected if Authenticated users, including privileged users, can access the file handling functionality without additional restrictions
  4. Check for path traversal protection on file operations
    Examine the file handling code or proxy configurations for input validation that restricts file paths to intended directories. Look for path sanitization logic.
    Affected if The application does not validate or restrict file path parameters to prevent traversal outside the web root folder
  5. Review application logs for suspicious file access patterns
    Examine access and application logs for requests with '../' sequences or attempts to access system directories such as /etc/, /windows/, or configuration files outside the web root.
    Affected if Such patterns are present in logs, indicating potential exploitation attempts or successful unauthorized access

A user is affected if they are running jeecg-boot version 3.6.0 and the application exposes file handling endpoints that accept path parameters without strict traversal protection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of jeecg-boot if available; otherwise implement strict input validation and path sanitization on all file-handling endpoints, and ensure file access is restricted to intended directories via whitelisting.

Fix this in Jeecg Boot Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-47467 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-47467 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data