CVE-2023-47581
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in TELLUS V4.0.17.0 and earlier and TELLUS Lite V4.0.17.0 and earlier. If a user opens a specially crafted file (X1, V8, or V9 file), information may be disclosed and/or arbitrary code may be executed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in TELLUS V4.0.17.0 and earlier when parsing specially crafted X1, V8, or V9 files. The vulnerability allows information disclosure and potentially arbitrary code execution due to insufficient bounds checking during file parsing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.0.17.0<= 4.0.17.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Fujielectric Tellus is installedCheck for Tellus installation directories or use system inventory tools to locate Fujielectric Tellus software on the systemAffected if Tellus or Tellus Lite is present on the system
-
Determine the installed Tellus versionLocate the Tellus executable or version information file (commonly found in the program installation directory) and retrieve the version metadataAffected if The installed version is 4.0.17.0 or earlier
-
Compare version to affected rangeCompare your installed version against the affected range (4.0.17.0 and earlier)Affected if The version number is 4.0.17.0 or lower
-
Confirm file parsing usageDetermine whether Tellus is configured to process X1, V8, or V9 file types, or if users typically open these file formats in TellusAffected if The software processes X1, V8, or V9 files and the version is within the affected range
A user is affected if Fujielectric Tellus or Tellus Lite is installed with a version of 4.0.17.0 or earlier and the software is used to parse X1, V8, or V9 files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUsers should avoid opening untrusted or specially crafted X1, V8, or V9 files until a vendor patch is available. The vendor should release an update addressing the out-of-bounds read in the file parsing logic.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-47581 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-47581 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data