CVE-2023-47613
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA CWE-23: Relative Path Traversal vulnerability exists in Telit Cinterion BGS5, Telit Cinterion EHS5/6/8, Telit Cinterion PDS5/6/8, Telit Cinterion ELS61/81, Telit Cinterion PLS62 that could allow a local, low privileged attacker to escape from virtual directories and get read/write access to protected files on the targeted system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA CWE-23 Relative Path Traversal vulnerability in Telit Cinterion cellular modem modules (BGS5, EHS5/6/8, PDS5/6/8, ELS61/81, PLS62) allows a local low-privileged attacker to escape configured virtual directories and gain unauthorized read/write access to protected filesystem locations outside the intended directory boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Telit Cinterion modem modules in your environmentInventory all cellular modem hardware and look for Telit Cinterion brand modules, specifically the BGS5, EHS5, EHS6, EHS8, PDS5, PDS6, PDS8, ELS61, ELS81, or PLS62 product families. Check device labels, firmware banners, or management interfaces for model identification.Affected if Any of these Telit modem models (BGS5, EHS5/6/8, PDS5/6/8, ELS61/81, PLS62) are deployed in the environment.
-
Confirm the firmware versionQuery the modem module for its firmware version using AT commands (such as AT+CGMR or ATI) or through the device management interface. Compare the returned version against the list of affected products which includes all versions of BGS5, EHS5, EHS6, EHS8, PDS5, PDS6, PDS8, ELS61 firmware.Affected if The modem firmware version matches any of the affected models (BGS5, EHS5, EHS6, EHS8, PDS5, PDS6, PDS8, ELS61) regardless of version number.
-
Check if virtual directory feature is enabledExamine the modem configuration for virtual directory settings. This is typically configured through the modem's web interface, AT commands for file system configuration, or in the device's security settings. Look for configurations that map virtual paths to filesystem locations.Affected if Virtual directories are configured on the modem, creating the condition for the path traversal vulnerability to be exploitable.
-
Assess local attack surface exposureEvaluate whether the modem's web server or file access interfaces are reachable from the local network or directly from the device. Check network exposure, authentication settings, and whether low-privileged local access to the device is possible.Affected if The modem is accessible locally without strong access controls, allowing a low-privileged local attacker to reach the virtual directory feature.
You are affected if you have any Telit Cinterion modem modules from the BGS5, EHS5/6/8, PDS5/6/8, or ELS61 product families with virtual directory configuration enabled and local access exposure.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided firmware patches from Telit to all affected modem modules; until patches are available, minimize local attack surface by restricting device access and network exposure, and consider network segmentation to limit exposure to local attackers.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-47613 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-47613 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data