PeepsoWordPress extension
CVE-2023-47850
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in PeepSo Community by PeepSo – Social Network, Membership, Registration, User Profiles allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Community by PeepSo – Social Network, Membership, Registration, User Profiles: from n/a through 6.2.2.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a stored XSS vulnerability in the PeepSo WordPress plugin (Community by PeepSo). User-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being stored and rendered in web pages, allowing authenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in other users' browsers when they view the affected content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
PeepsoWordPress extension
<= 6.2.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify PeepSo plugin is installedAccess WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and look for 'PeepSo - Community by PeepSo' in the listAffected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Check installed PeepSo versionIn the Plugins list, locate the PeepSo entry and note the version number displayed under the plugin nameAffected if The installed version is 6.2.2.0 or lower
-
Confirm user-generated content features are activeLog into the WordPress site as an authenticated user and verify that profile fields, post creation, comments, or other user input features are accessible and functionalAffected if Users can submit content through PeepSo forms and fields
-
Inspect user input handling for output encodingView the source code of pages displaying user-generated content (user profiles, activity feeds, posts). Check if special characters in user input are properly escaped before rendering in HTMLAffected if User-supplied content renders without proper HTML entity encoding (e.g., <script> tags appear literally in page source rather than as <script>)
If PeepSo version 6.2.2.0 or lower is installed AND user-generated content features are active AND output encoding is not applied to user inputs, the environment is affected by this stored XSS vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of PeepSo that addresses the input sanitization vulnerability. If no patch is available, implement proper output encoding and input validation on all user-generated content fields within the plugin.
Fix this in Peepso
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-47850 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-47850 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data