Wpforo ForumWordPress extension · Gvectors

CVE-2023-47869

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.2.6 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability in gVectors Team wpForo Forum allows Code Injection.This issue affects wpForo Forum: from n/a through 2.2.5.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in wpForo Forum versions up to 2.2.5 allows authenticated or anonymous users to inject malicious JavaScript code through forum posts. The plugin fails to properly sanitize user-supplied content before rendering it in web pages, enabling script injection attacks that can compromise other users' sessions or steal credentials.

MitigationUpgrade wpForo Forum to version 2.2.6 or later which contains the security patch. As a temporary measure, consider deploying a WAF rule to filter malicious script-related HTML tags.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Wpforo ForumWordPress extension
Affected:< 2.2.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check wpForo Forum plugin version
    Log in to WordPress admin panel, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, locate the wpForo Forum plugin, and note the version number displayed. Alternatively, check the plugin header in wp-content/plugins/wpforo/wpforo.php for the 'Version' defined field.
    Affected if The displayed version is less than 2.2.6 (e.g., 2.2.5, 2.2.4, 2.2.0, etc.)
  2. Verify forum posting is enabled
    Navigate to wpForo Forum settings or visit the forum as a user to confirm that creating new topics or replies is permitted. Check under wpForo > Settings > General that the forum is active and posting is not disabled.
    Affected if Forum posting functionality is enabled and users (authenticated or anonymous) can submit posts
  3. Inspect rendered HTML for unsanitized content
    Create a test forum post containing a simple script tag payload such as '<script>alert(1)</script>' in the post body. Submit the post, then view the page source of the rendered post in a browser to see if the script tag appears unescaped in the HTML.
    Affected if The script tag is rendered as literal HTML (visible in page source as <script>...</script>) rather than being escaped or stripped

You are affected if your installed wpForo Forum version is below 2.2.6 AND your forum allows users to create posts that render unescaped HTML/JavaScript in the output.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.2.6 or later
Fixed in 2.2.6
Interim mitigation

Upgrade wpForo Forum to version 2.2.6 or later which contains the security patch. As a temporary measure, consider deploying a WAF rule to filter malicious script-related HTML tags.

Recommended fix High confidence

wpForo Forum 2.2.6

  1. Backup your WordPress site database and files before updating
  2. Navigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins
  3. Find wpForo Forum in the plugin list
  4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to upgrade to version 2.2.6
  5. Alternatively, download wpForo Forum 2.2.6 from the official WordPress repository or gVectors website
  6. Deactivate and delete the current wpForo Forum plugin from Plugins page
  7. Upload and install the new version 2.2.6
  8. Verify the plugin is running version 2.2.6 after installation

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Wpforo Forum Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-47869 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-47869 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data