CVE-2023-48412
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn private_handle_t of mali_gralloc_buffer.h, there is a possible information leak due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA logic error in the private_handle_t structure of the ARM Mali gralloc buffer management (mali_gralloc_buffer.h) allows local information disclosure. The flaw appears to be in how buffer handles are processed, potentially exposing sensitive memory contents to unprivileged local users without requiring user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ARM Mali GPU is in useCheck /proc/mali or /sys/class/misc/mali for Mali device entries; or use 'cat /sys/class/misc/mali0/device/gpu_model' if available; alternatively, check dmesg for 'mali' or 'Mali-' kernel messages during bootAffected if The device contains an ARM Mali GPU (any variant) - this is the prerequisite for the vulnerability to apply
-
Identify the gralloc module vendorList files in /vendor/lib/hw/ or /system/lib/hw/ matching 'gralloc*' (e.g., gralloc.default.so, gralloc.mali.so); check the file's metadata or strings output for 'mali' referencesAffected if The gralloc module is the ARM Mali implementation (mali_gralloc) rather than a different vendor's implementation
-
Verify the private_handle_t structure exists in the gralloc binaryUse 'strings' on the gralloc module file (e.g., strings /vendor/lib/hw/gralloc.default.so | grep private_handle_t) or inspect the binary for references to 'private_handle_t' and 'mali_gralloc_buffer.h'Affected if The gralloc module contains the vulnerable private_handle_t structure from the Mali gralloc buffer management code
-
Check Android security patch levelRun 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' to retrieve the installed security patch date; compare against the date when the Mali gralloc patch became availableAffected if The security patch level is older than the vendor's patch release date for CVE-2023-48412, indicating the fix has not been applied
-
Confirm the device is unpatched by reviewing the gralloc module for the vulnerable logic patternAnalyze the gralloc binary for logic that improperly handles buffer handle bounds in the private_handle_t structure; look for code paths where buffer metadata is returned to unprivileged callers without proper isolationAffected if The gralloc module contains the flawed buffer handle processing logic that can expose memory contents to local unprivileged users
The device is affected if it uses an ARM Mali GPU with a gralloc module containing the vulnerable private_handle_t handling logic, and the security patch for CVE-2023-48412 has not been applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patch for the Mali GPU driver/gralloc module; if unavailable, review and correct the logic flow in private_handle_t handling to ensure proper bounds checking and data isolation.
December 2023 Android Security Patch Level (or subsequent monthly patches)
- Check current Android Security Patch Level on the device (Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level)
- Apply the latest Android system update containing the December 2023 security patch or later
- If the device manufacturer has not released an update, contact the device vendor for the patch containing the CVE-2023-48412 fix
- Verify the Mali GPU driver has been updated to a version that addresses the logic error in private_handle_t of mali_gralloc_buffer.h
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-48412 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-48412 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data