CVE-2023-48641
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedArcher Platform 6.x before 6.14 P1 HF2 (6.14.0.1.2) contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability. An authenticated malicious user in a multi-instance installation could potentially exploit this vulnerability by manipulating application resource references in user requests to bypass authorization checks, in order to gain execute access to AWF application resources.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in RSA Archer Platform versions 6.x before 6.14 P1 HF2. An authenticated attacker in a multi-instance environment can manipulate application resource references in requests to bypass authorization checks and gain unauthorized execute access to AWF (Archer Workflow) application resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.14.0.1.2< 6.13.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check RSA Archer Platform versionNavigate to the Archer Control Panel or About page in the Archer user interface to view the installed version. Alternatively, check the installation directory for version files or use the Archer System Administration > System Settings > About screen.Affected if The installed version is lower than 6.14.0.1.2 or is between 6.13.0.0 and 6.13.0.2 (i.e., < 6.13.0.3)
-
Confirm multi-instance environmentCheck Archer System Administration > Instance Management or review the Archer configuration files for multiple instance definitions. Look for multiple instance configuration entries in the web.config or archer.config files.Affected if More than one instance is configured in the Archer deployment
-
Verify AWF module is enabledCheck if the Archer Workflow (AWF) application module is installed and enabled. Navigate to System Administration > Module Management or review the available applications in the Archer platform.Affected if AWF (Archer Workflow) application is installed and active in the environment
-
Review instance isolation settingsExamine the instance isolation configuration in the Archer web.config file or through System Administration > Instance Settings. Verify that cross-instance resource access controls are properly configured.Affected if Instance isolation is not properly enforced, allowing resource references to be manipulated across instances
The environment is affected if the installed Archer Platform version is below 6.14.0.1.2 (or below 6.13.0.3), a multi-instance environment exists, and the AWF module is enabled without proper instance isolation controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.13.0.36.14.0.1.2
Upgrade to Archer Platform 6.14 P1 HF2 (6.14.0.1.2) or later. Additionally, implement robust object-level authorization validation for all resource references and enforce proper instance isolation in multi-instance deployments.
6.14 P1 HF2 (6.14.0.1.2) or later
- Schedule a maintenance window for the Archer platform upgrade
- Review the Archer 6.14 P1 HF2 (6.14.0.1.2) release notes and upgrade documentation for prerequisites
- Perform a full backup of the Archer database and configuration files
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- Apply the upgrade to production environment following the documented upgrade procedure
- Verify the installation by checking the version number in Archer Control Panel
- Test that AWF application resources are properly protected by authorization checks
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-48641 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-48641 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data