CVE-2023-48668
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell PowerProtect DD, versions prior to 7.13.0.10, LTS 7.7.5.25, LTS 7.10.1.15, 6.2.1.110 on DDMC contain an OS command injection vulnerability in an admin operation. A local high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to the execution of arbitrary OS commands on the managed system application's underlying OS with the privileges of the vulnerable application. Exploitation may lead to a system take over by an attacker on a managed system of DDMC.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDell PowerProtect DD versions prior to 7.13.0.10, LTS 7.7.5.25, LTS 7.10.1.15, and 6.2.1.110 contain an OS command injection vulnerability in the Data Domain Management Center (DDMC) admin interface. A local high-privileged attacker can exploit insufficient input validation in an administrative operation to inject and execute arbitrary OS commands with the privileges of the underlying application, potentially achieving complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.2.1.110>= 7.0, < 7.13.0.10>= 7.7, < 7.7.5.25>= 7.10, < 7.10.1.15CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed DDMC versionAccess the Dell PowerProtect DD admin console or CLI and retrieve the current software version. This is typically available in the system information or version details section of the management interface.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: < 6.2.1.110; >= 7.0 and < 7.13.0.10; >= 7.7 and < 7.7.5.25; >= 7.10 and < 7.10.1.15
-
Confirm admin interface is enabledVerify that the Data Domain Management Center administrative web interface or CLI management access is currently enabled and accessible on the system.Affected if The DDMC admin interface is accessible and the system is running a vulnerable version.
-
Identify local high-privileged accountsReview local user accounts with administrative or root-level privileges on the PowerProtect DD system. Check for accounts with administrative operation permissions.Affected if Local high-privileged accounts exist and the system is running a vulnerable version, as an attacker with such access could exploit the command injection.
The environment is affected if the installed PowerProtect DDMC version is lower than 6.2.1.110, or within 7.0-7.13.0.10, 7.7-7.7.5.25, or 7.10-7.10.1.15 ranges, and the admin interface is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.2.1.1107.7.5.257.10.1.15
Upgrade Dell PowerProtect DD to version 7.13.0.10, LTS 7.7.5.25, LTS 7.10.1.15 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict local administrative access and monitor for suspicious admin operations.
Upgrade to 6.2.1.110, 7.7.5.25, 7.10.1.15, or 7.13.0.10 depending on current release branch
- 1. Identify the current installed version of PowerProtect Data Domain Management Center
- 2. Determine which release branch is in use (6.x, 7.0-7.6, 7.7.x, 7.10.x, or 7.13.x)
- 3. Navigate to Dell support website (www.dell.com) and locate the PowerProtect DD download section
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed version: 6.2.1.110 for 6.x branch, 7.13.0.10 for 7.0-7.12 branch, 7.7.5.25 for LTS 7.7 branch, or 7.10.1.15 for LTS 7.10 branch
- 5. Review Dell upgrade documentation for DDMC before initiating upgrade
- 6. Apply the upgrade following standard Dell upgrade procedures with appropriate backups
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-48668 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-48668 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data