CVE-2023-48790
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cross site request forgery vulnerability [CWE-352] in Fortinet FortiNDR version 7.4.0, 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 and 7.1.0 through 7.1.1 and before 7.0.5 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized actions via crafted HTTP GET requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiNDR versions 7.4.0, 7.2.0-7.2.1, 7.1.0-7.1.1, and before 7.0.5 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute unauthorized actions via crafted HTTP GET requests due to missing anti-CSRF tokens or proper referer validation on sensitive endpoints.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.5.0, < 7.0.6>= 7.1.0, < 7.1.2>= 7.2.0, <= 7.2.2= 7.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm FortiNDR is installedCheck for FortiNDR processes or service: on Linux run 'ps aux | grep -i fortindr' or check for /opt/fortindr directory; on the appliance console use 'show system status' to confirm the product name.Affected if FortiNDR is not found, the system is not affected by this CVE.
-
Identify installed FortiNDR versionRun 'get system status' via FortiNDR CLI or check the web UI dashboard for the firmware version number displayed as 'Version' or 'Firmware'.Affected if The version matches any of these ranges: >= 1.5.0 and < 7.0.6; >= 7.1.0 and < 7.1.2; >= 7.2.0 and <= 7.2.2; or equals 7.4.0.
-
Determine if web management interface is accessibleAttempt to reach the FortiNDR web UI over HTTPS on port 443 or the configured management port. Check firewall rules and interface bindings with 'show system interface' in CLI.Affected if The web interface is accessible from untrusted networks, increasing exposure to unauthenticated attack vectors.
-
Inspect HTTP responses for anti-CSRF protectionCapture an HTTP response from a state-changing endpoint (such as /api/v2.0/... or sensitive GET requests) using browser dev tools or curl. Examine headers and cookies for anti-CSRF tokens (e.g., CSRFToken, X-CSRF-Token) and the presence of Referer header validation.Affected if State-changing GET endpoints lack CSRF tokens in requests/cookies and do not validate the Referer header, indicating the vulnerability is present.
A system is affected if it runs FortiNDR versions 1.5.0 through 7.0.5, 7.1.0-7.1.1, 7.2.0-7.2.2, or exactly 7.4.0, and its sensitive GET endpoints lack anti-CSRF token validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.67.1.2
Apply the vendor-supplied patch to upgrade to FortiNDR version 7.0.5 or later (or the fixed 7.2.x/7.4.x release) to implement proper CSRF token validation on state-changing GET endpoints.
FortiNDR 7.0.6 (for 7.0.x) or 7.1.2 (for 7.1.x) or 7.2.3 (for 7.2.x) or 7.4.1+ (for 7.4.0)
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiNDR version using the web UI or CLI (execute 'get system status' in FortiNDR CLI)
- 2. Based on current version, determine the minimum fixed release to upgrade to: if running 7.0.x, upgrade to 7.0.6; if running 7.1.x, upgrade to 7.1.2; if running 7.2.x, upgrade to 7.2.3; if running 7.4.0, upgrade to 7.4.1 or later
- 3. Before upgrading, back up the FortiNDR configuration via web UI (System > Settings > Backup & Restore) or CLI ('execute backup full-config')
- 4. Download the appropriate firmware upgrade file from Fortinet support portal (support.fortinet.com) matching the target fixed version
- 5. Upload and install the firmware via FortiNDR web UI (System > Firmware > Upload) or CLI ('execute system firmware upgrade <image-file>')
- 6. After upgrade completes, verify the new version is installed and the vulnerability is resolved by checking 'get system status' output
- 7. Confirm all expected services and configurations are operational post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-48790 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-48790 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data