Improper Privilege ManagementWeakness · CWE-269

CVE-2023-49232

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-03-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in Stilog Visual Planning 8. It allows an unauthenticated attacker to brute-force the password reset PINs of administrative users.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stilog Visual Planning 8 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in its password reset mechanism that allows unauthenticated attackers to brute-force the PINs used to reset administrative user passwords. The lack of rate limiting or account lockout protections on the password reset endpoint enables automated PIN guessing attacks against admin accounts.

MitigationImplement rate limiting, account lockout policies, and CAPTCHA on the password reset endpoint; also strengthen PIN generation to use longer, cryptographically random values.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Stilog Visual Planning installation and version
    Locate the Visual Planning installation directory and check version information in the application metadata, configuration files, or the application's 'About' interface. Common paths may include the program installation folder or the application's web root.
    Affected if The installed version is Visual Planning 8.x and the application is accessible over the network.
  2. Identify password reset endpoint exposure
    Map the application's web interface and locate the password reset or PIN-based account recovery endpoint. This is typically found in the login page or through the '/reset' or '/recovery' URL paths.
    Affected if The password reset endpoint is accessible from the network without authentication.
  3. Verify rate limiting on password reset endpoint
    Inspect the web server configuration (e.g., IIS, Apache, or built-in application settings) for rate limiting rules applied to the password reset endpoint. Test by sending multiple rapid password reset requests to observe if the application throttles or blocks the requests.
    Affected if No rate limiting, throttling, or request throttling is configured, allowing unlimited rapid requests to the password reset endpoint.
  4. Check account lockout policy configuration
    Review the application's security settings or Active Directory group policy if integrated, to determine if account lockout after failed attempts is enabled. Look for 'maxFailedAttempts' or 'lockoutThreshold' parameters in the configuration files.
    Affected if Account lockout is disabled or set to a very high threshold, allowing unlimited failed PIN attempts.
  5. Test PIN complexity and rotation
    Examine whether the system generates PINs using cryptographically secure random generation or uses predictable patterns. Attempt multiple password resets to observe if PINs follow a predictable sequence or have sufficient length and entropy.
    Affected if PINs are short, sequential, or generated using a predictable method.

The environment is affected if Stilog Visual Planning 8 is running and the password reset endpoint is exposed without rate limiting, account lockout protections, or strong PIN generation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement rate limiting, account lockout policies, and CAPTCHA on the password reset endpoint; also strengthen PIN generation to use longer, cryptographically random values.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-49232 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-49232 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data