Improper Input ValidationWeakness · CWE-20

CVE-2023-49615

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper input validation in some Intel(R) System Security Report and System Resources Defense firmware may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an improper input validation vulnerability in Intel System Security Report and System Resources Defense firmware. A privileged local user could exploit this to escalate their privileges, potentially gaining higher-level system access. The vulnerability requires local access and an already-privileged position to exploit.

MitigationApply the Intel firmware update when available through Intel's support channels. Restrict local administrative access to trusted personnel and monitor for privilege escalation attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Intel System Security Report firmware presence
    Check system firmware/BIOS version using tools like 'dmidecode', 'fwupdmgr get-devices', or Intel System Information Viewer. Look for Intel System Security Report or System Resources Defense firmware components.
    Affected if The system has Intel System Security Report or System Resources Defense firmware installed and the version cannot be determined or falls within an unpatched release range.
  2. Retrieve firmware version
    Run 'fwupdmgr get-version' or check BIOS/UEFI setup utility under Intel settings for System Security Report version information. Alternatively, use Intel Platform Management Framework (PLDM) tools if available.
    Affected if The installed firmware version is unknown or cannot be compared to a fixed version.
  3. Check for firmware update availability
    Run 'fwupdmgr get-updates' to query available firmware updates from LVFS (Linux Vendor Firmware Service) or check Intel's support site manually for CVE-2023-49615 related updates.
    Affected if No firmware update is available for the installed version, indicating it may remain unpatched.
  4. Verify current user privilege level
    Run 'whoami' or 'id' to confirm if the current user has administrative or root privileges. The vulnerability requires an already-privileged local user.
    Affected if The current user already has elevated privileges on the system.
  5. Review system audit logs for privilege escalation attempts
    Check /var/log/audit/audit.log (or Windows Event Viewer Security logs) for suspicious commands or unexpected privilege changes around the time frame the vulnerability would be exploitable.
    Affected if Unusual privilege escalation events are found that correlate with the vulnerable firmware component.

A user is affected if the system has Intel System Security Report or System Resources Defense firmware installed, the firmware version is unpatched, and the user already possesses elevated local privileges.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Intel firmware update when available through Intel's support channels. Restrict local administrative access to trusted personnel and monitor for privilege escalation attempts.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-49615 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-49615 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data